Re: DECnet on Ultrix & VMS

Article View: comp.sys.dec

Article #4599

#4599

From: tihor
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1987 23:00

3 lines
718 bytes

My guess: End node only Ethernet is pretty simple to write.  Is also a cheaper
license better suited to market penetration.  Also I believe that the Unix world
per se is not view as desiring much DECnet support, mostly the other way around.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13310001@acf4.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!tihor

References: <3418@cisunx.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!tihor
From: tihor@acf4.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: DECnet on Ultrix & VMS
Message-ID: <13310001@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Mar-87 18:00:00 EST
Article-I.D.: acf4.13310001
Posted: Tue Mar 24 18:00:00 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 26-Mar-87 05:36:09 EST
References: <3418@cisunx.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 3

Reply to Parent Message