Article View: comp.sys.dec
Article #4899Re: RSX
From: netnews
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1988 14:15
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1988 14:15
21 lines
939 bytes
939 bytes
To clarify some points: 1> When I asked about VAXELN development under ULTRIX I meant ULTRIX-32. Sorry, but a VAX question slipped in. 2> The bit about the J-11 and multiprocessing being "built-in" came from a DEC source, but maybe I misheard or they made a mistake :-). 3> The infomation in my earlier article was not covered by any nondisclosure agreement with DEC and so for public use. 4> Keep sending me your YES votes!!! Remember, anything I say is my opinion of what DEC's stance is and does not mean that DEC will indeed stand behind it (short-sighted fools :-)). Thanks; Rich Neitzel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9786@udenva.cair.du.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!boulder!cu-den!udenva!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!boulder!cu-den!udenva!news From: news@udenva.cair.du.edu (netnews) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,comp.org.decus Subject: Re: RSX Message-ID: <9786@udenva.cair.du.edu> Date: 12 Feb 88 14:15:08 GMT Distribution: na Organization: Univ. of Denver, CO, USA Lines: 21