Article View: comp.sys.dec
Article #4926Re: Alternative backup devices for UNIX VaxStation 2000's
From: Steve Ward
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1988 17:32
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1988 17:32
11 lines
824 bytes
824 bytes
I agrtee that there should be a much lower cost backup approach. I guess the assumption is that you have an Ethernet LAN with server support somewhere. I must say that the TK50 has been reliable for us for quite some time. Early TK50's did have problems, mostly with defective cartridges amnufactured by #M Corp for DEC.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<921@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cfa!wardReferences:
<1073@ndmath.UUCP> <4044@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <538@hscfvax.harvard.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cfa!ward From: ward@cfa.harvard.EDU (Steve Ward) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: Alternative backup devices for UNIX VaxStation 2000's Message-ID: <921@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU> Date: 16 Mar 88 17:32:21 GMT References: <1073@ndmath.UUCP> <4044@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <538@hscfvax.harvard.edu> Organization: Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. for Astrophysics Lines: 11 Summary: TK50 has been reliable for us