Article View: comp.sys.dec
Article #5580Re: Merits of two DS5400's vs. one DS5810?
From: Steinar Kj{rnsr|d
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 12:57
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 12:57
24 lines
1673 bytes
1673 bytes
Thanks to all those of you who responded to the DSxxxx performance report I provided, but I'm afraid the report contained an error: At the bottom of page 7 and in figure 2, page 8, the number '2000' should be '20000'. Since I no longer can (or want to!) control the future distribution of this document, I kindly ask those of you who retrieved a copy to either correct the number or retrive a new version from ifi.uio.no. I'm sorry to bother all comp.unix.ultrix readers with this kind of "noise". +==================================================================+ ! ! ! Steinar Kjaernsroed, ! ! Dpt. of informatics, ! ! University of Oslo, ! ! P.O.Box 1080, Blindern, ! ! 0316, Oslo 3, ! ! NORWAY ! ! ! ! Phone: 047+2+453460 (work), ! ! Email: steinar@ifi.uio.no (Internet) ! ! ..!mcvax!ifi!steinar (UUCP) ! ! ! +==================================================================+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CMM.0.88.634309060.steinar@fram.uio.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!nuug!ifi!fram!steinarReferences:
<13031@watcgl.waterloo.edu> <9400@cbmvax.commodore.com> <CMM.0.88.633884980.steinar@fram.uio.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!nuug!ifi!fram!steinar
From: steinar@fram.uio.no (Steinar Kj{rnsr|d)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Merits of two DS5400's vs. one DS5810?
Message-ID: <CMM.0.88.634309060.steinar@fram.uio.no>
Date: 6 Feb 90 12:57:40 GMT
References: <13031@watcgl.waterloo.edu> <9400@cbmvax.commodore.com>
<CMM.0.88.633884980.steinar@fram.uio.no>
Sender: steinar@ifi.uio.no
Lines: 24