Article View: comp.sys.dec
Article #608Re: DecStation 2100 and 3100 binary compatible?
From: Ken A. Nishimura
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1989 21:41
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1989 21:41
14 lines
1026 bytes
1026 bytes
In article <11679@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> woolstar@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu (John D Woolverton) writes: >Does anyone know if DS 3100 and 2100 are binary compatible? >I'd like to cluster both together off of one disk. > > John d Woolverton > woolstar@csvax.caltech.edu Yes, 100%. In fact, as far as I can tell (and heard through various people), the 2100 and 3100 are identical except for clock speed and the speed of the static ram used for caching. I have both and am running both off the same cluster of disks. -ken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30826@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!janus!kennishReferences:
<11679@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!janus!kennish From: kennish@janus.uucp (Ken A. Nishimura) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec Subject: Re: DecStation 2100 and 3100 binary compatible? Message-ID: <30826@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 22 Aug 89 21:41:42 GMT References: <11679@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: kennish@janus.UUCP (Ken A. Nishimura) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 14