Article View: comp.sys.dec
Article #746Re: 4mm Versus 8mm Tape Backup Subsystems
From: George Robbins
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 1989 15:23
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 1989 15:23
20 lines
1559 bytes
1559 bytes
In article <21496.2524aa95@ceres.physics.uiowa.edu> rlm@ceres.physics.uiowa.edu writes:
> I posted an inquiry a few weeks ago about 4mm DAT tape subsystems, but no one
> seemed to have any experience. We have a VAX-3200 (Q-bus)+2x3100 (VMS) cluster
> with some 1.5 GB of disk which we need to backup with minimal operator
> intervention. The choices seem to be:
>
> We need to purchase something right away because at the moment we have NO
> backup device...
8mm is a hell of a lot better than no backups. I don't know that the whole
story is in, but many people are using them and even if something else turns
out much better, I would expect the 8mm drives and technology to have at
least a 3 year useful life. It's just too soon to tell about the DAT stuff -
if you are brave, get one on a test basis, but the chances are much greater
that the drive/company/format will be orphaned within a year...
--
George Robbins - now working for, uucp: {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
but no way officially representing arpa: cbmvax!grr@uunet.uu.net
Commodore, Engineering Department fone: 215-431-9255 (only by moonlite)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8101@cbmvax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!grrReferences:
<21496.2524aa95@ceres.physics.uiowa.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!grr From: grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec Subject: Re: 4mm Versus 8mm Tape Backup Subsystems Message-ID: <8101@cbmvax.UUCP> Date: 5 Oct 89 15:23:30 GMT References: <21496.2524aa95@ceres.physics.uiowa.edu> Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins) Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 20