Re: USL C++ Time class and hpux tztab conversion

Article View: comp.sys.hp.hpux

Article #17

#17

From: Frank Slootweg
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 14:00

11 lines
1030 bytes

Marcel Bucher (bucher@zhea008) wrote:
[deleted]
> The hpux way is much more flexible about the switching day (it gets
> computed considering day of week in a certain period), but it seems to be
> non standard.

  What do you mean by "non standard"? ctime(3C) confirms to all the
applicable standards, see the STANDARDS CONFORMANCE part of ctime(3C).
The internal *implementation*, i.e. /usr/lib/tztab, might be non
standard(ized), but, as far as I know, the *syntax and semantics* of
ctime(3C), TZ et al are standard conformant.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <45dua0$ik@hpuamsa.neth.hp.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!hpuamsa.neth.hp.com!franks

References: <44p04s$6mj@euusp8.siemens-albis.ch>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!hpuamsa.neth.hp.com!franks
From: franks@neth.hp.com (Frank Slootweg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp.hpux,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: USL C++ Time class and hpux tztab conversion
Followup-To: comp.sys.hp.hpux,comp.lang.c++
Date: 10 Oct 1995 14:00:32 GMT
Organization: HP's Dutch Customer Response Center
Message-ID: <45dua0$ik@hpuamsa.neth.hp.com>
References: <44p04s$6mj@euusp8.siemens-albis.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hpuamsa.neth.hp.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 (PGP) PL2.4]

Reply to Parent Message