🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim
Article #155

Re: perfomance problem with voodoo5?

#155
From: Bard
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00
49 lines
2920 bytes
the card isn't going to make much difference in JF-18 and F-4 with frame
rates as there simply is not enough grunt in you p3-500 to generate the
higher FPS.

I've found that F4 FPS scales very well with CPU upgrades.

--
Bard
www.1vvfsc.org
Vancouver Virtual Flight Sim Club



Chuck <cobrasvt@NOmy-dejanewsSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:397C3A03.7BBD9ADC@NOmy-dejanewsSPAM.com...
> First let me say everything people are ranting about FSAA is true.  Once
> you've used it you dont ever know how you dealt with the shimmering.
> FSAA is definitely not just about the "jaggies".
>
> I'm having some unusual findings with the Voodoo 5500.  Naturally, when
> I first got it I wanted to see if it was faster than the Voodoo3 it
> replaced.  Fired up quake2 and unreal and there was real improvement.
> This is on a P3 500 (560...5x112), 128mb ram, Monster sound MX300,
> Stickworks digital F22/TQS, Linksys Etherfast 10/100 (dont think
> anything but the processor matters, but who knows!)
>
> Next, I do F4, JF/A-18, and USAF and there wasn't any improvement over
> the Voodoo3, maybe even somewhat worse (at fastest performance).  But
> then when testing with FSAA, there was no performance hit, same rates on
> or off.  I even went as far as to install win 98 clean on a hidden
> partition, install USAF and still no change.  And yes, FSAA was really
> off with the "fastest performance" setting and on with the "FSAA
> x4"setting. This was with the box drivers, the hacked drivers, and today
> with the 1.01.00.
>
> I know from reading about the FSAA toggle key registry hack that the
> Voodoo 5 reserves memory, etc. and that the toggle wont improve frame
> rate.  I wonder if something is wrong with my install or card that would
> explain this relative performance lag over my voodoo3.  Or maybe I'm
> just exposing the fact that video is not the bottleneck.  Still, I would
> expect some improvement over the v3.
>
> Still, even if this isn't some error, the image quality is well worth
> it, and I'm not getting much frame rate difference with FSAAx4, so it's
> kind of a freebie right now.
>
> Chuck
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <397c73c7@newsserver1.intergate.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <397C3A03.7BBD9ADC@NOmy-dejanewsSPAM.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1117b2,4db9b8cb336995a1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1117b2,public
X-Google-Thread: 114911,4db9b8cb336995a1
X-Google-Attributes: gid114911,public
From: "Bard" <bard@pissoffspam.planetfortress.com>
Subject: Re: perfomance problem with voodoo5?
Date: 2000/07/24
Message-ID: <397c73c7@newsserver1.intergate.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 650185000
References: <397C3A03.7BBD9ADC@NOmy-dejanewsSPAM.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
X-Trace: 24 Jul 2000 09:50:15 -0700, pm39s41.intergate.ca
Organization: Planet Fortress
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "Bard" <bard@pissoffspam.planetfortress.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,3dfx.products.voodoo5