Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim
Article #155Re: perfomance problem with voodoo5?
From: Bard
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00
49 lines
2920 bytes
2920 bytes
the card isn't going to make much difference in JF-18 and F-4 with frame rates as there simply is not enough grunt in you p3-500 to generate the higher FPS. I've found that F4 FPS scales very well with CPU upgrades. -- Bard www.1vvfsc.org Vancouver Virtual Flight Sim Club Chuck <cobrasvt@NOmy-dejanewsSPAM.com> wrote in message news:397C3A03.7BBD9ADC@NOmy-dejanewsSPAM.com... > First let me say everything people are ranting about FSAA is true. Once > you've used it you dont ever know how you dealt with the shimmering. > FSAA is definitely not just about the "jaggies". > > I'm having some unusual findings with the Voodoo 5500. Naturally, when > I first got it I wanted to see if it was faster than the Voodoo3 it > replaced. Fired up quake2 and unreal and there was real improvement. > This is on a P3 500 (560...5x112), 128mb ram, Monster sound MX300, > Stickworks digital F22/TQS, Linksys Etherfast 10/100 (dont think > anything but the processor matters, but who knows!) > > Next, I do F4, JF/A-18, and USAF and there wasn't any improvement over > the Voodoo3, maybe even somewhat worse (at fastest performance). But > then when testing with FSAA, there was no performance hit, same rates on > or off. I even went as far as to install win 98 clean on a hidden > partition, install USAF and still no change. And yes, FSAA was really > off with the "fastest performance" setting and on with the "FSAA > x4"setting. This was with the box drivers, the hacked drivers, and today > with the 1.01.00. > > I know from reading about the FSAA toggle key registry hack that the > Voodoo 5 reserves memory, etc. and that the toggle wont improve frame > rate. I wonder if something is wrong with my install or card that would > explain this relative performance lag over my voodoo3. Or maybe I'm > just exposing the fact that video is not the bottleneck. Still, I would > expect some improvement over the v3. > > Still, even if this isn't some error, the image quality is well worth > it, and I'm not getting much frame rate difference with FSAAx4, so it's > kind of a freebie right now. > > Chuck > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<397c73c7@newsserver1.intergate.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<397C3A03.7BBD9ADC@NOmy-dejanewsSPAM.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1117b2,4db9b8cb336995a1 X-Google-Attributes: gid1117b2,public X-Google-Thread: 114911,4db9b8cb336995a1 X-Google-Attributes: gid114911,public From: "Bard" <bard@pissoffspam.planetfortress.com> Subject: Re: perfomance problem with voodoo5? Date: 2000/07/24 Message-ID: <397c73c7@newsserver1.intergate.ca> X-Deja-AN: 650185000 References: <397C3A03.7BBD9ADC@NOmy-dejanewsSPAM.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 X-Trace: 24 Jul 2000 09:50:15 -0700, pm39s41.intergate.ca Organization: Planet Fortress X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: "Bard" <bard@pissoffspam.planetfortress.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,3dfx.products.voodoo5