🚀 go-pugleaf

Overall l prefer the party to the single member, for variety. If I am
fighting with one player and he is a magic user, let's say, there may be
times I want to just break the ice by whacking things with brute force.
Single player games dont allow for this. Party members also allow for more
creativity in defeating monsters.
But Gerry's point is well made. I prefer party games, but some of my all
time favorites were single person games.

--
"I realized, sitting there, that I was a nut."  Philip Dick, Confessions of
a Crap Artist
Gerry Quinn wrote in message <6jou27$2g2$1@news.indigo.ie>...
>In article <355FF78E.A4E3AF26@student.unsw.edu.au>, Maria and Simon Ratner
<z2152908@student.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>I am a computer RPG developer, and i just want some opinions from the guys
who
>>play the games ...
>>
>>What are people's thoughts on whether it is better to have a single
>>character (ie Diablo), or a party ?
>>
>>Good and bad points for either ?..
>>
>
>Just keep reading this group and you'll get lots of opinions.  You
>might want to post to rec.games.design for the designer's view also.
>
>I've played and enjoyed both types.  It's a choice which affects the
>whole game design, and there is no one correct answer (or number of
>characters).
>
>- Gerry
>
>===========================================================
> http://indigo.ie/~gerryq/Brewster/brewster.htm
> Brewster Kaleidoscopic Screensaver for Windows 95
> The only saver that simulates a real kaleidoscope
>===========================================================