Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Article #337Re: How fast is the AMD K6?
From: Michael
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00
54 lines
3447 bytes
3447 bytes
Coltof EW <ecoltof@cs.vu.nl> wrote in article <64pj0i$eb5$1@star.cs.vu.nl>... > PrEzTo (au138@chebucto.ns.ca) wrote: > : =3D>> Well, I don't know about the K6, but I know the FPU of my AMD 5x86 = > : 133 > : =3D>> is only the equivalent of an Intel P75. Which is why I say: Go = > : Intel! > : =3D>> John The 5x86 is, despite the name, a 486 chip. No wonder it *only* performs as well as a P75. > : =3D>Or as I say go bankrupt!!! > : =3D>To go intel costs about 20% extra for the same clock speed and as > : =3D>someone who doesn't play quake I don't give a toss what the FPU speed > : =3D>is. > > : QUAKE is not the only thing the FPU is used for!!! It's also used for > : intensive mathematical calculations which is why Intel chips have been > : popular in the past as they are now. If Quake was the only reason for > : a faster FPU then Intel would die! Not only that, the Quake team > : could of used integer calculations and made the code a lot faster. > : What am I to say, programmers are getting lazier with all this new > : technology ;-). The K6 has a great FPU. It's not superpipelined, like Intel's, but it's plenty fast. The issue with Quake is that the game engine was specifically optimized for a superpipelined FPU, which means that Intel chips run Quake particularly well. Software optimized for the K6's architecture would run better on it than on a Pentium. If you run GLQuake and use a high-end 3D accelerator like a 3Dfx board -- the only real setup for serious Quakers -- the benefits of Intel's FPU are negligible. > Well, if floating point is REAL important, like Raytracing, there's always > the alpha AXP, those things are FAST. As soon as I have a job i'm going > to save my money to buy one. I do a lot of numerical math and simulations, > I think I'm gonna like it. > BTW I don't like Quake, so I dont'care about that. Overall, the performance of the K6 falls somewhere between a P55C and a PII. It rivals a PII is some areas and falls short in others. Currently, it is the best price/performance CPU value available, although the price for end users of the 233 MHz version is much higher than it should be due to a persistent shortage. -- md To send me non-spam e-mail, delete the "XXX" from my address.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bcf472$c20a1120$7a3dd6ce@dc0022>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3479776b.16050497@read.news.globalnet.co.uk> <3457c9cc.3486712@news.halcyon.com> <63a4bb$prs@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> <3458F7F1.5575B5DE@infinetxx.com> <63l2qv$7q@server4.softdisk.com> <345E2DF7.231A@erols.com> <34602A49.66D2@hotmail.com> <3462f4b9.1815341@snews.zippo.com> <64pj0i$eb5$1@star.cs.vu.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f8e37,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gidf8e37,public X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gid10a2ed,public X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public X-Google-Thread: 109e38,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public X-Google-Thread: 112149,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gid112149,public From: "Michael" <mdecker1XXX@msn.com> Subject: Re: How fast is the AMD K6? Date: 1997/11/18 Message-ID: <01bcf472$c20a1120$7a3dd6ce@dc0022> X-Deja-AN: 290727246 References: <3479776b.16050497@read.news.globalnet.co.uk> <3457c9cc.3486712@news.halcyon.com> <63a4bb$prs@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> <3458F7F1.5575B5DE@infinetxx.com> <63l2qv$7q@server4.softdisk.com> <345E2DF7.231A@erols.com> <34602A49.66D2@hotmail.com> <3462f4b9.1815341@snews.zippo.com> <64pj0i$eb5$1@star.cs.vu.nl> Organization: Netcom X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Nov 18 4:40:46 PM CST 1997 Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,biz.comp.hardware,comp.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc