🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Article #337

Re: How fast is the AMD K6?

#337
From: Michael
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00
54 lines
3447 bytes

Coltof EW <ecoltof@cs.vu.nl> wrote in article
<64pj0i$eb5$1@star.cs.vu.nl>...
> PrEzTo (au138@chebucto.ns.ca) wrote:
> : =3D>> Well, I don't know about the K6, but I know the FPU of my AMD
5x86 =
> : 133
> : =3D>> is only the equivalent of an Intel P75. Which is why I say: Go =
> : Intel!
> : =3D>> John

The 5x86 is, despite the name, a 486 chip.  No wonder it *only* performs
as well as a P75.

> : =3D>Or as I say go bankrupt!!!
> : =3D>To go intel costs about 20% extra for the same clock speed and as
> : =3D>someone who doesn't play quake I don't give a toss what the FPU
speed
> : =3D>is.
> 
> : QUAKE is not the only thing the FPU is used for!!!  It's also used for
> : intensive mathematical calculations which is why Intel chips have been
> : popular in the past as they are now.  If Quake was the only reason for
> : a faster FPU then Intel would die!  Not only that, the Quake team
> : could of used integer calculations and made the code a lot faster.
> : What am I to say, programmers are getting lazier with all this new
> : technology ;-).

The K6 has a great FPU.  It's not superpipelined, like Intel's, but it's
plenty fast.  The issue with Quake is that the game engine was
specifically optimized for a superpipelined FPU, which means that Intel
chips run Quake particularly well.  Software optimized for the K6's
architecture would run better on it than on a Pentium.  If you run GLQuake
and use a high-end 3D accelerator like a 3Dfx board -- the only real setup
for serious Quakers -- the benefits of Intel's FPU are negligible.

> Well, if floating point is REAL important, like Raytracing, there's
always
> the alpha AXP, those things are FAST. As soon as I have a job i'm going
> to save my money to buy one. I do a lot of numerical math and
simulations,
> I think I'm gonna like it. 
> BTW I don't like Quake, so I dont'care about that.

Overall, the performance of the K6 falls somewhere between a P55C and a
PII.  It rivals a PII is some areas and falls short in others.  Currently,
it is the best price/performance CPU value available, although the price
for end users of the 233 MHz version is much higher than it should be due
to a persistent shortage.
-- 
md

To send me non-spam e-mail, delete the "XXX" from my address.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <01bcf472$c20a1120$7a3dd6ce@dc0022>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3479776b.16050497@read.news.globalnet.co.uk> <3457c9cc.3486712@news.halcyon.com> <63a4bb$prs@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> <3458F7F1.5575B5DE@infinetxx.com> <63l2qv$7q@server4.softdisk.com> <345E2DF7.231A@erols.com> <34602A49.66D2@hotmail.com> <3462f4b9.1815341@snews.zippo.com> <64pj0i$eb5$1@star.cs.vu.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f8e37,49d919137faf3eec
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8e37,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,49d919137faf3eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a2ed,public
X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,49d919137faf3eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public
X-Google-Thread: 109e38,49d919137faf3eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public
X-Google-Thread: 112149,49d919137faf3eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid112149,public
From: "Michael" <mdecker1XXX@msn.com>
Subject: Re: How fast is the AMD K6?
Date: 1997/11/18
Message-ID: <01bcf472$c20a1120$7a3dd6ce@dc0022>
X-Deja-AN: 290727246
References: <3479776b.16050497@read.news.globalnet.co.uk> <3457c9cc.3486712@news.halcyon.com> <63a4bb$prs@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> <3458F7F1.5575B5DE@infinetxx.com> <63l2qv$7q@server4.softdisk.com> <345E2DF7.231A@erols.com> <34602A49.66D2@hotmail.com> <3462f4b9.1815341@snews.zippo.com> <64pj0i$eb5$1@star.cs.vu.nl>
Organization: Netcom
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Nov 18  4:40:46 PM CST 1997
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,biz.comp.hardware,comp.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc