Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Article #356Re: How fast is the AMD K6?
From: Leonard F. Agius
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 00:00
50 lines
2968 bytes
2968 bytes
How fast is the AMD K-6? MY K-6 233 did well on the Winbench 97 test: CPUMark16 467 CPUmark32 574 I ran Wintune 97 too: Dhrystone 466 MIPS Whetstone 143 MLFOPS I've got no complaints. I think the K-6 is a great chip. Zimbalt wrote: > > espomen@erols.com wrote: > > > > Darrin wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 03 Nov 1997 22:29:51 -0800, SH <drhuang@2xtreme.net> wrote: > > > > > > >K5 133 is as fast as a p133! It blows away a p75. What is wrong with you > > > >people? You think anything that says PENTIUM is automatically faster then > > > >anything else? Intel has ALOT of chinks in their armor that are going to be > > > >exposed very soon by AMD. > > > > > > > > > > he wasn't talking about a K5, he was talking about the 5x86. > > > > > > Darrin's Vegas News and Links > > > http://www.angelfire.com/nj/kitaro > > > > Yes, I meant the 5x86... I know it's just a souped up 486; it goes in a > > 486 motherboard! I also just noticed that it says "K5-75" on the chip, > > so I guess my comment was irrelevant... oh well... :-) > > > > John > If you know/knew that the AMD 5x86 is really an advanced 486, why troll > like this in the first place? For accuracy, its the fastest 486 ever > made...133MHz. That its overall performance equals only a P75 says a lot > about how fast PC CPU technology advances...although the > speed-advance-increments seem to be getting smaller and smaller as time > goes by. > -- > To discourage freaking mailbots, an asterisk has been placed at the > start of my domain name. Remove it to respond. > > If there is hope, wrote Winston, it lies in the proles..... > -George Orwell, "Nineteen Eighty-Four"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<645i6a$57v$1@usenet89.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3479776b.16050497@read.news.globalnet.co.uk> <3457c9cc.3486712@news.halcyon.com> <63a4bb$prs@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> <3458F7F1.5575B5DE@infinetxx.com> <63l2qv$7q@server4.softdisk.com> <345E2DF7.231A@erols.com> <345E90A1.7C4F@epix.net> <345EC0DF.C51B9E98@2xtreme.net> <63n1sf$s45@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <345E4766.1EBE@erols.com> <644jnn$s1g$2@titan.globalserve.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f8e37,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gidf8e37,public X-Google-Thread: 109e38,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gid10a2ed,public X-Google-Thread: 112149,49d919137faf3eec X-Google-Attributes: gid112149,public From: "Leonard F. Agius" <"nospamlfagius"@ noapamDHOL.com> Subject: Re: How fast is the AMD K6? Date: 1997/11/09 Message-ID: <645i6a$57v$1@usenet89.supernews.com> X-Deja-AN: 288169142 References: <3479776b.16050497@read.news.globalnet.co.uk> <3457c9cc.3486712@news.halcyon.com> <63a4bb$prs@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> <3458F7F1.5575B5DE@infinetxx.com> <63l2qv$7q@server4.softdisk.com> <345E2DF7.231A@erols.com> <345E90A1.7C4F@epix.net> <345EC0DF.C51B9E98@2xtreme.net> <63n1sf$s45@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <345E4766.1EBE@erols.com> <644jnn$s1g$2@titan.globalserve.net> Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com Reply-To: nospamlfagius@, noapamDHOL.com Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,biz.comp.hardware,comp.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc