Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Article #648Re: Shuttle Hot-565 -- it fits my needs but is it any good?
From: Antos
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 00:00
57 lines
3133 bytes
3133 bytes
I have a hot-569 and it's great. Got it for $94 (tax extra) at a
computer show...(Nov 1st), prices were anywhere between 90-100 at the
booths I looked at...your mileage may vary....
I only had one problem...the COM port addresses and irq were set as
default to what was normally com2 (as com 1) (they were switched), and
com 2 was auto...which sometimes refused to initialize the mouse or
external modem..with the latest bios, I had to set com1 to the normal
irq4 and com 2 to irq3 (with the standard addressses), then
everything worked perfectly since then. If you have problems with
modem or mouse not being found, that's probably it.
-Ike
On Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:31:17 -0600, Jeff Heyen <jheyen@mmmpcc.org>
wrote:
>Smitty wrote:
(snip)
>
>Smitty, instead of the HOT-565 consider the HOT-569. It has all the
>features of the 565 with the added feature of auto detect of the CPU and
>its voltage. According to the reviews I've read it's also more friendly
>to overclocking.
>
>I've been running the 569 for about a month now and it's been rock
>steady. I've seen it as low as $109.
>
>Jeff Heyen
remove the "faked" in my email address to email me via usenet reply...
done to foil the USENET spam-bots...
Any spam or junk email that is sent to me will have the sender charged
a $400 dollar proofreading fee and a $100 dollar harassment fee. Do not
send unsolicited email to this address. Sending email automatically
acknowledges agreement to these terms.
"By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets
the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is
unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By
Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is
punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation."
Antos Dragon
OO
++
O ||
O||||[UDIC]=||##########>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>==============-
O ||
++
OO
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<348252b4.71494984@news.earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<65s1m5$r79@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <34820555.40AE@mmmpcc.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,2d1f4ab3af9ce446 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public X-Google-Thread: f583c,2d1f4ab3af9ce446 X-Google-Attributes: gidf583c,public X-Google-Thread: 109e38,2d1f4ab3af9ce446 X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public X-Google-Thread: f5f89,2d1f4ab3af9ce446 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,public X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,2d1f4ab3af9ce446 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a2ed,public X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,2d1f4ab3af9ce446 X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public From: kylearan@FAKEDhotmail.com (Antos) Subject: Re: Shuttle Hot-565 -- it fits my needs but is it any good? Date: 1997/12/01 Message-ID: <348252b4.71494984@news.earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 294115505 References: <65s1m5$r79@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <34820555.40AE@mmmpcc.org> Organization: ---- Reply-To: kylearan@FAKEDhotmail.com Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,alt.comp.hardware,demon.tech.pc,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard