Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.comm
Article #232Re: Psion Dacom Surfer vs. Diamond SupraExpress 336i
From: Darin Starr
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 00:00
22 lines
1446 bytes
1446 bytes
Anthony Hill wrote: > > On 16 Apr 1997 14:17:45 GMT, mhoenig@ast.cam.ac.uk (Michael Hoenig) > wrote: > >I have decide to finally buy my own modem and it looks like two 33.6k modems > >have made it to the final choice (because of price/quality considerations > >mainly!): the Psion Dacom Surfer and the Diamond SupraExpress 336i (internal). > >The Surfer got really good reviews, and I would be willing to purchase it > >despite its rather garish (or "stylish" as the PR dept. puts it) exterior. The > >SupraExpress also seems a good choice, and it seems to have Flash ROM which > To clarify: In general, the SupraExpress line does not have flash ROM. The exceptions being: 1) SupraExpress 336 ASVD 2) SupraExpress 56k Darin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33583857.5BDD@peak.org.blah>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5j2n29$fc@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk> <3354f465.1042311@nntp.uunet.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10beba,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid10beba,public X-Google-Thread: 102a94,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid102a94,public X-Google-Thread: 105ed0,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid105ed0,public From: Darin Starr <starrda@peak.org.blah> Subject: Re: Psion Dacom Surfer vs. Diamond SupraExpress 336i Date: 1997/04/18 Message-ID: <33583857.5BDD@peak.org.blah> X-Deja-AN: 235860069 References: <5j2n29$fc@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk> <3354f465.1042311@nntp.uunet.ca> Organization: Bite My Head Reply-To: starrda@peak.org.blah Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.comm,demon.tech.modems,comp.dcom.modems