🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc
Article #499

Re: Western Digital Replacement of Defective Drives

#499
From: dino
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 00:00
46 lines
2680 bytes
On Thu, 27 Feb 97 01:30:45 GMT, j-dawg@ix.netcom.com (Jay Gorrell)
wrote:

>In article <33162CE9.7B61@nwj.com>, dpincus@inetconn.net wrote:
>>If the hard drive passes, a screen message will say so. If it doesn't
>>pass (mine didn't), it will display a Failure Code Number and tell you
>>to contact Western Digital Technical Support. I called their 800 number
>>(listed in the documentation), gave them the Failure Code Number, and
>>they said they will send a newer model 1.6 Gb drive within the next 8 to
>>10 days, and to return the suspect drive in the same shipping container.
>>No argument, no fuss.
>>
>
>Mine also failed - Does anyone have a good 1.6Gb drive??
>
Yes, My AC31600H drive passed the test.

Here is what my report said if you want to compare it to what yours
said:

******** Begin Verify Drive Test 2/26/97, 19:44:22 *******

Model:        WDC AC31600H
S/N:            WD-WT2891572896
Firmware:  23.16U23
C H S:         3148 16 63
Drive:          1
Baseport:   0x1F0
DCM:           CNBCYBHB
Build Date: 04-04-1996


Test stopped as of 2/26/97, 19:50:05
NO ERRORS DETECTED FOR THIS DRIVE.
Final Code For This Drive: 0000
Test Complete.


I don't know about you two, but it came to me as a bit of a shock when
I saw the quality bulletin.

Why Drive 1?  My other Drive is a WDC AC31200F.

Although the 31200 has a smaller cache and all, it was my only drive
until I added the 31600.  I made the 31600 slave.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <331c0984.17043466@gateway>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <33162CE9.7B61@nwj.com> <5f2o53$nun@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 16b814,313591b4d45fc312
X-Google-Attributes: gid16b814,public
X-Google-Thread: 14a1b0,313591b4d45fc312
X-Google-Attributes: gid14a1b0,public
X-Google-Thread: fdb6e,313591b4d45fc312
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb6e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,313591b4d45fc312
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
X-Google-Thread: 1019d9,313591b4d45fc312
X-Google-Attributes: gid1019d9,public
X-Google-Thread: 11196f,313591b4d45fc312
X-Google-Attributes: gid11196f,public
X-Google-Thread: 109e38,313591b4d45fc312
X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,313591b4d45fc312
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
From: dino@bedrock.com
Subject: Re: Western Digital Replacement of Defective Drives
Date: 1997/02/27
Message-ID: <331c0984.17043466@gateway>
X-Deja-AN: 222362383
References: <33162CE9.7B61@nwj.com> <5f2o53$nun@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems,comp.arch.storage,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.setup.hardware,biz.marketplace.computers.pc-clone,fido7.hardw,fido7.hardw.pc.peripheral