Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc
Article #546Re: Plug'n'Play? I think not!
From: Tom Bird
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:00
51 lines
3055 bytes
3055 bytes
In article <rO9ACAAphHe3EwAI@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk>, Paul Richards <Paul@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> writes > >Tom Bird writes, >[stuff about IRQ's] > >It's amazing how much trouble some ppl have with IRQ's and I've never >had any problems with them. I've got 2 ISA cards, 2 PCI cards, 2 COM >ports (do these take IRQ's?) and 1 LPT port (takes an IRQ?). How many >IRQ's do PC's have? Is there a "map" of IRQ's somewhere that shows you >what's attached to them? By default (just a basic machine, EIDE, 2S, 1P) 00 - System Timer 01 - keyboard 02 - cascade for second 8259 [1] 03 - COM 2 04 - COM 1 06 - FDD 07 - LPT 1 08 - system RTC 09 - linked to IRQ2 for the cascade 12 - PS/2 mouse 13 - maths co-pro (not really necessary but that's just tough) 14 - EIDE 1 15 - EIDE 2 [1] XT's only had 8 interrupts, from one 8259 interrupt controller. When they made the AT (286), they botched the second 8259 (for more interrupts) onto IRQ 2 for compatibility. If you have ever tried to get two conflicting devices onto 2 and 9, it won't work. They are the same interrupt. On my machine, as I have only occasional need for IDE (testing devices), EIDE 2 is disabled. Got me back a whole interrupt, that did. The Matrox Marvel nicked that one. >I suppose juggling IRQ's was like the good ol' days of juggling about to >get 3 Kb more conventional memory...? Ooarr... my old 286, 640k RAM - to get some of the fancier games to run, I had to actually execute them from config.sys with the 'install' command - command.com took too much RAM, I needed about 614k free for this game. With no HMA, EMS or XMS to offload data into, it was tight but it worked. I had a 1Mb graphics card in that PC, I used to use Windows 3.0 in real mode, in 1024x768 256 colours. The frame buffer was bigger than the total main RAM. HTH, TB
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Cp0O9VAZFOe3EwXE@dbqa.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<ECsb3.35235$%65.81553@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <376E5CED.43B3425@nospam.visi.com> <kltb3.35240$%65.81344@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <bASi2GAVT9b3EwPb@ghastly.demon.co.uk> <ep+JdDAmc+b3EwcT@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <C0ePEFAFVUc3EwnO@ghastly.demon.co.uk> <IMWcUZAYM7c3Ew1U@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <rO9ACAAphHe3EwAI@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,ad4d1d0c1a28d38f X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public X-Google-Thread: 10869b,ad4d1d0c1a28d38f X-Google-Attributes: gid10869b,public X-Google-Thread: 109e38,ad4d1d0c1a28d38f X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public From: Tom Bird <hamster@nospam.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Plug'n'Play? I think not! Date: 1999/06/29 Message-ID: <Cp0O9VAZFOe3EwXE@dbqa.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 495264861 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: dbqa.demon.co.uk:194.222.32.233 References: <ECsb3.35235$%65.81553@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <376E5CED.43B3425@nospam.visi.com> <kltb3.35240$%65.81344@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <bASi2GAVT9b3EwPb@ghastly.demon.co.uk> <ep+JdDAmc+b3EwcT@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <C0ePEFAFVUc3EwnO@ghastly.demon.co.uk> <IMWcUZAYM7c3Ew1U@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <rO9ACAAphHe3EwAI@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking,demon.tech.pc X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 930676523 nnrp-09:10641 NO-IDENT dbqa.demon.co.uk:194.222.32.233 Organization: Tom's TeamServer MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking,demon.tech.pc