🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <819061281snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
           David@longley.demon.co.uk "David Longley" writes:

> Do the following benchmakes seem correct for a 
> 
> Pentium 120
> 256K CELP
> 32MB EDO RAM
> 
> The Cache figures seem low?
> 
>                           CPU-cache: 1. level: 1 KB, 2. level: 4 KB
> 
> maximum RAM thruput (without cache): 59473 KB/s (effective wait states: 3.5)
>        CPU cache thruput: 1. level: 596591 KB/s, 2. level: 477273 KB/s
> 
>                     extended memory: 31744 KB (INT 15h thruput: 36300 KB/s)
>                     expanded memory: 32064 KB (EMS 4.0, thruput: 32199 KB/s)
> 
> -- 
> David Longley
> 
It seems to be reporting the incorrect cache sizes.
The following is for my P100, 256k 15ns sync, 32 meg 70ns FPR.
I am also currently testing a new M/B which gives 30% better preformance
with the same memory.

                          CPU-cache: 1. level: 8 KB, 2. level: 256 KB

maximum RAM thruput (without cache): 43034 KB/s (effective wait states: 4.1)
                  CPU cache thruput: 1.level: 367133 KB/s, 2.level:129925 KB/s

                    extended memory: 14336 KB (INT 15h thruput: 29801 KB/s)
                    expanded memory: 14656 KB (EMS 4.0, thruput: 27661 KB/s)

                  Dhrystones/second: 79941.9 (CPU: 219.2-fold of XT)
    Double-Precision Kilowhetstones: 44927.5 (FPU: 462.8-fold of XT w/ 8087)
            Double-Precision MFLOPS: 3.884 (FPU: 312.1-fold of XT w/ 8087)

 COMPTEST  2.59  (c) 1988-1993 N.J. 

-- 
Rajesh Varia     raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk