🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking
Article #38

Re: 100Base-t switch and card, which is best?

#38
From: Ann and Michel PY
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 00:00
47 lines
2727 bytes
Albert Gjaltema wrote:
> 
> sconnell@dipix.com (Shawn Douglas Connelly) wrote:
> 
> >I am planing the purchase of a 100base-T switch.
> 
> >Hopefully, there exists an Ethernet switch with two 100Base-T ports
> >and four 10Base-T ports.
> snip
> >Problems:
> >* I have only found switches with *one* 100Base-T port, four 10Base-T
> >* There are many to choose from....and no reviews to work from.
> >* My budget is limited to around $2000.00 CDN
> 
> >Here is what I've found (so far), all have only one 100Base-T uplink:
> snip
> >* SMC EZswitch EZ008Plus ~2100.00 CDN
> >  This one includes: five 10Base-T and two 100Base-T but is unmanaged.
> >  How important is the ability to manage a small network of under
> >  100 nodes?
> snip
> >Also, I will need to purchase 10/100Base-T PCI network cards...so far
> >this is my short list of good(?) cards.
> >* 3Com Etherlink XL 10/100 PCI ~170.00 CDN (auto 10/100)
> >* AsanteFast 10/100 PCI ~180.00 CDN (auto 10/100 recognition?)
> >* SMC Etherpower 10/100 PCI ~190.00 CDN
> >* Kingston EtheRX 10/100 PCI ~110.00 CDN (cheap! but good?)
> 
> >Thank you for your assistance
> 
> We're using the SMC etherswitch PLUS (actually about five of them).
> They are good value for money but...
> 1-of the ordered 5 one was a DOA
> 2-we had some freak problem with half of the network locking up every
> now and then which was traced back to a poor connection to the switch
> (other port worked just fine).
> You could call this the expected 'turbulence' that these
> inttroductions of new technology create but still......
> For the servers we use the 3Com: no problem as long as you are not
> running NW 3.11 (can't handle more than 1 nic.
>  Check for PCI-compatiblity, especially on 'old' PCI busses.
> 
> Good luck,
> Albert Gjaltema

Use 3com. The price difference is not worth the trouble.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <331F5727.486F@wired2.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3308da9c.11624158@news2.magmacom.com> <5fmerp$a2v$1@news.Zwolle.NL.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fa2c1,a25042108199c769
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa2c1,public
X-Google-Thread: fe659,a25042108199c769
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public
X-Google-Thread: 10869b,a25042108199c769
X-Google-Attributes: gid10869b,public
X-Google-Thread: 104ed6,a25042108199c769
X-Google-Attributes: gid104ed6,public
From: Ann and Michel PY <arn-py@wired2.net>
Subject: Re: 100Base-t switch and card, which is best?
Date: 1997/03/06
Message-ID: <331F5727.486F@wired2.net>
X-Deja-AN: 223625304
References: <3308da9c.11624158@news2.magmacom.com> <5fmerp$a2v$1@news.Zwolle.NL.net>
Organization: West Coast Online's News Server - Not responsible for content
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking,bit.listserv.novell,microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking