Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking
Article #38Re: 100Base-t switch and card, which is best?
From: Ann and Michel PY
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 00:00
47 lines
2727 bytes
2727 bytes
Albert Gjaltema wrote: > > sconnell@dipix.com (Shawn Douglas Connelly) wrote: > > >I am planing the purchase of a 100base-T switch. > > >Hopefully, there exists an Ethernet switch with two 100Base-T ports > >and four 10Base-T ports. > snip > >Problems: > >* I have only found switches with *one* 100Base-T port, four 10Base-T > >* There are many to choose from....and no reviews to work from. > >* My budget is limited to around $2000.00 CDN > > >Here is what I've found (so far), all have only one 100Base-T uplink: > snip > >* SMC EZswitch EZ008Plus ~2100.00 CDN > > This one includes: five 10Base-T and two 100Base-T but is unmanaged. > > How important is the ability to manage a small network of under > > 100 nodes? > snip > >Also, I will need to purchase 10/100Base-T PCI network cards...so far > >this is my short list of good(?) cards. > >* 3Com Etherlink XL 10/100 PCI ~170.00 CDN (auto 10/100) > >* AsanteFast 10/100 PCI ~180.00 CDN (auto 10/100 recognition?) > >* SMC Etherpower 10/100 PCI ~190.00 CDN > >* Kingston EtheRX 10/100 PCI ~110.00 CDN (cheap! but good?) > > >Thank you for your assistance > > We're using the SMC etherswitch PLUS (actually about five of them). > They are good value for money but... > 1-of the ordered 5 one was a DOA > 2-we had some freak problem with half of the network locking up every > now and then which was traced back to a poor connection to the switch > (other port worked just fine). > You could call this the expected 'turbulence' that these > inttroductions of new technology create but still...... > For the servers we use the 3Com: no problem as long as you are not > running NW 3.11 (can't handle more than 1 nic. > Check for PCI-compatiblity, especially on 'old' PCI busses. > > Good luck, > Albert Gjaltema Use 3com. The price difference is not worth the trouble.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<331F5727.486F@wired2.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3308da9c.11624158@news2.magmacom.com> <5fmerp$a2v$1@news.Zwolle.NL.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fa2c1,a25042108199c769 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa2c1,public X-Google-Thread: fe659,a25042108199c769 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: 10869b,a25042108199c769 X-Google-Attributes: gid10869b,public X-Google-Thread: 104ed6,a25042108199c769 X-Google-Attributes: gid104ed6,public From: Ann and Michel PY <arn-py@wired2.net> Subject: Re: 100Base-t switch and card, which is best? Date: 1997/03/06 Message-ID: <331F5727.486F@wired2.net> X-Deja-AN: 223625304 References: <3308da9c.11624158@news2.magmacom.com> <5fmerp$a2v$1@news.Zwolle.NL.net> Organization: West Coast Online's News Server - Not responsible for content Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking,bit.listserv.novell,microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking