seagate or ibm scsi - which would you keep? - Article 1111 - go-pugleaf

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

Article #1111

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Previous Next

seagate or ibm scsi - which would you keep?

#1111

From: Brian Sheehan
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 1996 00:00

16 lines
1021 bytes

I have promised a friend of mine one of my SCSI drives, either a
Seagate Hawk 2  ST11900N 1.7gb SCSI-2 drive or an IBM
DeskstarDPES-31080 1gb SCSI-2 drive, the Seagate is about six months
older than the IBM,and also runs a lot quicker.

Forgetting about the size difference, (my main drive is a 2gb IBM)
which would those of you who really know SCSI drives recommend for me
to keep - I would put reliability very close to the top of my list of
requirements.

Opinions welcome
Brian Sheehan
Bristol,England
bds@globalnet.co.uk
===================

Technical Details

Message-ID: <31ba89c4.0@news.globalnet.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,9b3df9d609574c39,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,9b3df9d609574c39,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
From: bds@globalnet.co.uk (Brian Sheehan)
Subject: seagate or ibm scsi - which would you keep?
Date: 1996/06/09
Message-ID: <31ba89c4.0@news.globalnet.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 159261010
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,demon.tech.pc