Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #113Re: Is there any real performance difference between SCSI and IDE?
From: Brian K. Chen
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 10:28
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 10:28
14 lines
1172 bytes
1172 bytes
triumph@ix.netcom.com (Gregory Patten) wrote: >This is all true, but due to decreased overhead, Windows runs faster >with IDE drives. So it depends on what you're doing. BTW, it shouldn't >cosst him $400 extra, if he's willing to use and NCR SCSI controller. >Perhaps $100 for the controller and $100 extra for a 1 gig HD. Of >course if you need 2 gig or more of storage in a single drive, you have >to go SCSI. Are you talking about the SCSI Command Overhead? If you get the Adaptect SCSI Adepter that came with a RISC processor on board, it will even speed every things up. Brian
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<46ai5g$2e2@news-e1a.megaweb.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!usenetReferences:
<DGCI1D.3ry@cdf.toronto.edu> <45jlf9$403@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <45nfu8$f37@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!usenet From: BrianChen@GNN.COM (Brian K. Chen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: Is there any real performance difference between SCSI and IDE? Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 10:28:32 GMT Organization: Megaweb Message-ID: <46ai5g$2e2@news-e1a.megaweb.com> References: <DGCI1D.3ry@cdf.toronto.edu> <45jlf9$403@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <45nfu8$f37@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: @www-1-187.gnn.com X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 21 Oct 1995 10:31:12 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82