🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #116

Re: Is there any real performance difference between SCSI and IDE?

#116
From: Brian Tao
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 07:09
14 lines
1212 bytes
In article <Pine.SGI.3.91.951019221314.19568B-100000@chaos.ph.utexas.edu>, Alex Predtechensky  <aap@chaos.ph.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
> Second, do not use in your tests the 8k block size. There is a linear
> degradation in performance (to zero) if this size is less than 16k -
> by some reason, drives do not like short blocks (cache problem?). The
> maximum performance happens at about 60+-2 k per block, (not 64 or
> more by unknown reason). 

    Don't decent drivers perform write clustering to avoid sending a
whole bunch of small write requests to the drive?
-- 
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org)
Systems Administrator, Internex Online Inc.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"
Technical Details
Message-ID: <46cqmv$rbq@ionews.io.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!io.org!nobody
References: <465isk$gdb@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au> <Pine.SGI.3.91.951019221314.19568B-100000@chaos.ph.utexas.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!io.org!nobody
From: taob@ionews.io.org (Brian Tao)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: Is there any real performance difference between SCSI and IDE?
Date: 22 Oct 1995 03:09:19 -0400
Organization: Internex Online (io.org) Data: 416-363-4151  Voice: 416-363-8676
Message-ID: <46cqmv$rbq@ionews.io.org>
References: <465isk$gdb@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au> <Pine.SGI.3.91.951019221314.19568B-100000@chaos.ph.utexas.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: flinch.io.org