Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #1188Re: Rocket versus 32-bit file access
From: John Steele
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 13:00
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 13:00
53 lines
3539 bytes
3539 bytes
In article <39sbrt$ogp@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com> BJSpace@ix.netcom.com (B. E. Johnson) writes: >Path: tequesta.gate.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews >From: BJSpace@ix.netcom.com (B. E. Johnson) >Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,demon.tech.pc >Subject: Re: Rocket versus 32-bit file access >Date: 10 Nov 1994 05:42:21 GMT >Organization: Netcom >Lines: 60 >Distribution: world >Message-ID: <39sbrt$ogp@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com> >References: <674529809wnr@rosebery.demon.co.uk> >NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-mon1-02.ix.netcom.com >In <674529809wnr@rosebery.demon.co.uk> Brian@rosebery.demon.co.uk (Brian >Sheehan) writes: >> >>I'm currently trying to decide to establish my windows 3.11 >>setup with either 32 bit file and disk acccess enabled or >>to use the utility Rocket. Under DOS I'm certainly getting >>better performance but under Windows the performance seems >>almost identical (I'm using the Western Digital driver for >>my two hard disks), although throughput figures measured >>with PC Tools for Windows gives Rocket a slight edge. >>The throughput is about 1200kbs. [snip] >My jury is still out on DR but the 'feel' you get that the machine is >faster with 32-bit enabled is real and has little to do with the >transfer rate. What is making the big difference is that with standard >Windows the Windows system drops repeatedly into real mode to do disk >transfers and then back up into 386 enhanced after each file is read in. [snip] > .^:_._:^. : > :-:.^.:-: B.E.Johnson : As has always been, > :_:|=|:_: American Air&Space Artist : We navigate by the stars. > : :|.|: : : > :-/|.|\-: : Only now... [snip] The other factor is that as I recall, vcache is a file cache as opposed to a track cache -- as a result all, or a significant portion, of a file a read in to the cache so its available more readily. the track cache approach reads one or more tracks in, which may or maynot contain the data needed next. +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | information systems technology, inc. | jsteele@insyte.com | | marcus centre - penthouse 20 | +1.305.595.4845 | | 9990 southwest 77 avenue | +1.305.595.4983 (fax) | | miami, florida 33156-2660 | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jsteele.31.046286F4@insyte.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!yale!gumby!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!tequesta.gate.net!miafl-23.gate.net!jsteeleReferences:
<674529809wnr@rosebery.demon.co.uk> <39sbrt$ogp@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,41be0babe0d39d00 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,41be0babe0d39d00 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-10 14:35:56 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!yale!gumby!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!tequesta.gate.net!miafl-23.gate.net!jsteele From: jsteele@insyte.com (John Steele) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,demon.tech.pc Subject: Re: Rocket versus 32-bit file access Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 13:00:34 LOCAL Organization: information systems technology, inc. Lines: 53 Distribution: world Message-ID: <jsteele.31.046286F4@insyte.com> References: <674529809wnr@rosebery.demon.co.uk> <39sbrt$ogp@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: miafl-23.gate.net X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]