Re: ZiP -vs- EZ135

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

Article #157

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Previous Next

#157

From: global1.net asterisk
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 23:52

18 lines
1081 bytes

A few differences: Zip uses floppy type cartridges -in a rigid case- and
the EZ uses hard drive type disks in its cartridges. The EZ is a little
faster when getting data off its cartridges. Price nearly the same these
days and the cartridges are the same price. The EZ cartridge holds a bit
more data (after you reformat it) than does the Zip drive cartridge.  

asterisk@global1.net (who has an EZ drive)

In article <4bfgk7$of0@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>, Inindo <szaid@bnr.ca> wrote:

> Just wondering what the specs are on the Iomega Zip drive against
> the SyQuest EZ135 drive...
> 
> Which one is better?  And do they use the similar technology or is it
> vastly different?
> 
> Thanx...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <global1.net-2612951954150001@ppp10.global1.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ppp10.global1.net!user

References: <4bfgk7$of0@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ppp10.global1.net!user
From: global1.net (asterisk)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: ZiP -vs- EZ135
Date: 26 Dec 1995 23:52:28 GMT
Organization: The Global One, Inc.
Message-ID: <global1.net-2612951954150001@ppp10.global1.net>
References: <4bfgk7$of0@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp10.global1.net

Reply to Parent Message