Re: Parallel ZIP Drive Really SCSI ???

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

Article #357

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Previous Next

#357

From: IJdo Dijkstra
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 13:48

16 lines
935 bytes

dzou@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu wrote:

>Since both SCSI and parallel Zip drives are at the same price, why anyone would
>try to convert a parallel to a SCSI?

Because in that case you would have the benefit of both for the price
of one.
 
PP for portability
SCSI for speed.


IJdo Dijkstra       aurora@xs4all.nl
----------------------------------------------
   http://www.xs4all.nl/~aurora
  CS student, Freelance sysadmin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <314abbe8.13420926@news.xs4all.nl>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!EU.net!sun4nl!xs4all!usenet

References: <DnwM5D.Aq6@mccc.edu> <4hnstr$7u0@panix3.panix.com> <1996Mar15.192102@miavx1>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!EU.net!sun4nl!xs4all!usenet
From: aurora@xs4all.nl (IJdo Dijkstra)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: Parallel ZIP Drive Really SCSI ???
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 13:48:53 GMT
Organization: XS4ALL, networking for the masses
Message-ID: <314abbe8.13420926@news.xs4all.nl>
References: <DnwM5D.Aq6@mccc.edu> <4hnstr$7u0@panix3.panix.com> <1996Mar15.192102@miavx1>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mas01-26.dial.xs4all.nl
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.168

Reply to Parent Message