Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #422Re: Problem 80 wire cable for hard disk
From: Rod Speed
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:01
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:01
62 lines
4065 bytes
4065 bytes
Meat Plow wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:08:05 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH>wrote: > >> Rod Speed wrote: >> >>>> Signalling wise, there is no difference between a 40- and 80-wire >>>> IDE cable. >> <which is qualified in a following paragraph regarding cable select> >>> >>> Wrong. 80 wire cables are usually cable select cables, 40 wire >>> cables usually are not. >> >> Get an ohmmeter to test. >> >> http://www.unitechelectronics.com/ide44pinout.gif >> (this is the drive header, same pinout as for mobo header; remember >> to mirror the image for ribbon connector) >> >> Cable select cables require a pin (#28) not be connected on one of >> the device-side connectors. I already mentioned in my prior post >> how this can be done. The host adapter grounds this signal (i.e., >> when connected, the device sees a ground line). If pin 28 is >> connected at the device (i.e., the device sees this signal is >> grounded), it is the master device. If this pin is open (floating), >> that device is the slave. >> >> Just get a continuity tester to determine in pin 28 is open on one >> of the device connectors on the ribbon cable. I have 80-wire, >> 40-pin cables that have pin 28 connected and some where it is open. >> I have not seen a predominance of one or the other to claim a >> "usual" configuration, and because of this is why I test. It all >> depends on who manufactured the cable. For example, the >> manufacturer might want that same 80-wire cable to be usable in >> 40-wire cable setups so they feed pin 28 to all connectors. The same >> holds true as to whether the connector or shroud are polarized with >> a tang or notch, if depolarized by the absense of a tang or having >> notches on both sides of the shroud, or if pin 20 is used as a >> polarizing key (by pin 20 missing in header and blocked or solid in >> the connector). You have to look. For cable-select or not enforced >> in the manufacture of a 80-wire ribbon cable, you have to check with >> a continuity check. >> >> If the connectors on the ribbon cable are color coded, I would >> suspect cable-select was enforced through the physical connections >> as follows: >> >> - Blue: Motherboard. Pin 28 connected. >> - Black: Master device. Pin 28 connected. >> - Gray: Slave device. Pin 28 not connected. >> >> But I'd still check pin 28 with a continuity tester to make sure. >> You may not have cable-enforced cable-select with some 80-wire >> ribbon cables (i.e., pine 28 goes to all connectors) when you want >> to use cable-select on the device jumpers. You may not want >> cable-enforced cable-select if you are using jumpers on the devices >> to configure them as master and slave. Whether you have a >> cable-select cable is something you should really test. > > Dell has been using Cable Select for at least 11 years. > Long before 80 wire and UDMA 5 came to fruition. And so did Compaq.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7v32quFvpfU1@mid.individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<j0ino5p7hrvcjpd357c0o7338tqtp5ta5n@4ax.com> <hmh1f9$u9s$1@news.albasani.net> <7v2hceFtu0U1@mid.individual.net> <hmhabg$e14$1@news.albasani.net> <3ie1l5.8lm.19.1@news.alt.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 4e777fa27a,8c9ecfd22775703a X-Google-Attributes: gid4e777fa27a,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,24hoursupport.helpdesk Subject: Re: Problem 80 wire cable for hard disk Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:01:32 +1100 Lines: 64 Message-ID: <7v32quFvpfU1@mid.individual.net> References: <j0ino5p7hrvcjpd357c0o7338tqtp5ta5n@4ax.com> <hmh1f9$u9s$1@news.albasani.net> <7v2hceFtu0U1@mid.individual.net> <hmhabg$e14$1@news.albasani.net> <3ie1l5.8lm.19.1@news.alt.net> X-Trace: individual.net cVBUQknTUhY1Cgu+LNAgtgxnv5atNiZMveEpyd93DCkikWay8= Cancel-Lock: sha1:UDWvCXmAYlUNaMgLY2qF6PXykMA= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original