🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #462

Re: Problem with Western Digital's WD6400AAKS

#462
From: Arno Wagner
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:40
89 lines
4551 bytes
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Penang <kalambong@gmail.com> wrote:
> I need to to know if people with huge capacity SATA hard drives (500GB
> and up) have the following problem :

> Bought a new hard drive, install it, formatted the disk, install the
> OS, use it for 2 months, and then weird things start popping up.

> The hard drive that I am using is Western Digital's WD6400AAKS -- a
> 640GB hard drive.

> I bought it to replace my 250 GB drive, which is running out of
> capacity. I do a lot of video editing.

> Bought the hard drive back in 2nd of July this year. Install the hard
> drive into my PC, partitioned it into 2 logical volume (Drive C: and
> Drive D:) and then install the OS onto it. The OS that I use is Win
> XP. The HD is formatted under NTFS file system.

> Drive C: has 30 GB and the rest, about 570GB, falls under drive D:

> I ran chkdsk (check disk) on both partitions (chkdsk /f /r /x) and
> there wasn't any error. So I thought I had bought a good drive and was
> feeling very happy.

First mistake: Chkdsk doe snot check the disk at all. It only lok
s at the filesystem medatada. Use a long SMART selftest for a disk
ckeck (can be started with most SMART tools).

> It runs okay for 2 months, and then ...

> Sometimes when I start my PC, the PC can't find the drive.

> Other times, the PC can find the drive, but running extra ordinarily
> slow.

> I dropped down to the Command Prompt level, use "chkdsk" again to
> check what's wrong.

> The command that I use is still the same "chkdsk /x /r /f" --- to
> dismount the disk, and to "fix" the disk if there is anything wrong,
> and to check (recover) bad sector.

> Long and behold, there _ARE_ bad sectors !!

Nad, Vey bad.

> Drive C has 82KB of bad sectors, and Drive D has 288KB of bad sectors.

> This is a drive that I'd just used for 2 months !! And the
> manufacturing date (the date stamped on the label of the drive)
> indicated that it was made June, 2008. In all account, this is a _NEW_
> drive, and it is developing BAD SECTORS !!!

So? The technical term is infant mortality. It happens and is
one of the reasons youy need backup.

> The 250GB drive that I used never gave me any problem. This 640GB,
> however, worries me !

> I know that 400KB of bad sector, for a 640GB (actually it's 597GB
> after formatted) hard drive, is insignificant. But still, bad sectors
> are still BAD SECTORS, and I am afraid that the bad sectors would
> spread !!

Any bad sectors are significant. The occasional single one might not 
be, but that is 800'000 bas sectors, if your diagnosis is right,
an a reason to toss the driev.

> That is why I am posting this message, asking the people who have more
> experience than me in using huge capacity hard drive --- is the bad
> sectors common occurrance?

> Or that I'm just too unlucky to get myself a lemon?

I would think lemmon.

> BTW, the hard drive is EXTREMELY HOT, not warm, but VERY HOT !!! I do
> not have the actual temperature in it (I do not know if there is any
> utility out there that would give me the drive's actual temperature)
> but when I touch the drive, it was very HOT !!!

Speedfan, e.g., displays dirve temperature. Temperature is one of
the main HDD killers. 

So, get a SMART utility, run along SMART selftes and
look at the SMART attributes (or post them here). Chkdsk
is unusable for HDD diagnostics.

Arno
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6ifj2qFq9gliU2@mid.individual.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <0be95232-1d86-4262-8806-9bfb0ed20e59@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,1d4e6eec42071101
X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,1d4e6eec42071101
X-Google-Thread: 108f8f,1d4e6eec42071101
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,1d4e6eec42071101
X-Google-Thread: faa3c,1d4e6eec42071101
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,gid10a2ed,gid108f8f,gidf5f89,gidfaa3c,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Arno Wagner <me@privacy.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware,24hoursupport.helpdesk
Subject: Re: Problem with Western Digital's WD6400AAKS
Date: 6 Sep 2008 14:40:26 GMT
Lines: 89
Message-ID: <6ifj2qFq9gliU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <0be95232-1d86-4262-8806-9bfb0ed20e59@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
X-Trace: individual.net X+hILA/75srmZ/Xmz3U3KgYWuBGEQlUoJKqAYnpIcB1N71zg==
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2PKSNZ0E9gp5CbdqxYDA3gm+YaE=
User-Agent: tin/1.4.1-19991201 ("Polish") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.18.8_sata (i686))