🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #507

Re: Low Level Format of IDE - bad idea?

#507
From: Helen T. Redlus
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 00:00
20 lines
1484 bytes
Hi Steve,
  Technically your are correct - you should not low level format an IDE 
drive.  In fact, if you are lucky enough to receive a flyer packaged with 
your IDE hard drive it will generally tell you DO NOT LOW LEVEL 
FORMAT...unless you use our program "filename".  Unfortunately, with hard 
drives that I've purchased recently you are lucky if you get any 
documentation with it at all.

Helen

smann@rahul.net  (Steve Mann in San Jose, CA) wrote:

>Then, technically, I was correct - low-level formatting an IDE is a bad 
>thing.  I was unaware that the manufacturers had responded with a 
>user-available remedy.  
>
>Thanks for the update.
>
>-- 
>Stephen Mann <smann@rahul.net>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3orc9m$hn0@hustle.rahul.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3oiseq$iul@hustle.rahul.net> <3ok71a$o94@hustle.rahul.net> <3old3q$3ki@progress.progress.com> <3or45k$srr@hustle.rahul.net> <3ora6h$d9g@hustle.rahul.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111b8f,649a127ebe34c3bc
X-Google-Attributes: gid111b8f,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,649a127ebe34c3bc
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
From: "Helen T. Redlus" <hredlus@rahul.net>
Subject: Re: Low Level Format of IDE - bad idea?
Date: 1995/05/10
Message-ID: <3orc9m$hn0@hustle.rahul.net>
X-Deja-AN: 102445370
references: <3oiseq$iul@hustle.rahul.net> <3ok71a$o94@hustle.rahul.net> <3old3q$3ki@progress.progress.com> <3or45k$srr@hustle.rahul.net> <3ora6h$d9g@hustle.rahul.net>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: a2i Communications
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,a2i.general
nntp-posting-user: hredlus
x-mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)