🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <jnavasD12vG4.Aw3@netcom.com>, John Navas <jnavas@netcom.com> wrote:
>Andrys D Basten (andrys@netcom.com) wrote:
>
>> >> 57600 does not work on certain boards very well,
>> >> even with my 16550AFN uart, while it does on other boards, so I dial in at
>> >> 38,400 to ensure quicker transfers that don't have to wait for resends.
>> >
>> >
>> >Then there is something wrong with your system -- I use 57600 (or higher)
>> >for *all* connections without any problems.
>
>> People report, on a couple of boards, that they cannot function at 57600
>> there whereas they can on their other boards.  I don't imagine you hit every
>> board in America <g>.
>
>
>No offense, but that is simply impossible -- the difference between 38400
>and 57600 serial port speed does *not* affect the system at the other end.


Here's a question for you.  Am trying out a number of remote-control,
remote-node products, and noticed in the older (version 5) PC Anywhere/Lan,
the US Robotics Sportster is listed as operating best at '38400' while the
Digicom Scout Plus is listed as doing best at '57600' ...

Besides PC Anywhere's own eccentricities (whatever they may be), what, in
the manufacturing or specs of the products, produce these recommendations.
I have a Scout Plus, but the Sportsters are all over.

  - A


--
 ,------------------------------------------------------------------------,
 |  Andrys Basten  <andrys@netcom.com>  |  Basten Micro Consulting (DOS)  |
 |    Have Early Music, Will Travel     |   Berkeley-San Francisco, CA    |
 |      Harpsichord, recorders          |          510-235-3861           |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+