🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #504

Re: Low Level Format of IDE - bad idea?

#504
From: Matthew J. Harper
Date: Mon, 08 May 1995 00:00
31 lines
1971 bytes
smann@rahul.net  (Steve Mann in San Jose, CA) writes:

>Kevin@Computer.com wrote:

>: I did a low level format of an IDE drive a friend gave me.  It is a 
>: conner 120 meg IDE drive.  After that I partitioned it and did a DOS 
>: format, and it all worked.  Or appeared to.  Then I ran double space, 
>: which gave me a message about an 'unrecoverable' error - and now I cannot 
>: access the drive at all - not with Super-Stor, not with fdisk, nothing!  
>: Have I killed my drive somehow?  Is it bad to do a low level format of an 
>: IDE?

>Bad?  That's an understatement.

>The manufacturer may reformat it for you, for a fee.  You could try some 
>of the data recovery companies to see what it would cost.  Chances are 
>the cost of reformatting will be more than the disk is worth.

Bah!  Every drive manufacturer that I know of has a utility you can download
from their BBS to fix this problem yourself for free (except for the download
time of course.)

They work fine.  yes, you shouldn't low-level format an IDE drive, but you can
recover from it *without* spending big bucks.

-Matth
--
Matthew J. Harper      |       Quality Architect       | {disclaimer.i}
Progress Software Corp.|                               |    DoD #1149
matth@progress.com     |          Zymurgist            |  Ahhhhh, Bock!
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3old3q$3ki@progress.progress.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3oiseq$iul@hustle.rahul.net> <3ok71a$o94@hustle.rahul.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111b8f,649a127ebe34c3bc
X-Google-Attributes: gid111b8f,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,649a127ebe34c3bc
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
From: matth@progress.COM (Matthew J. Harper)
Subject: Re: Low Level Format of IDE - bad idea?
Date: 1995/05/08
Message-ID: <3old3q$3ki@progress.progress.com>
X-Deja-AN: 102293801
references: <3oiseq$iul@hustle.rahul.net> <3ok71a$o94@hustle.rahul.net>
organization: Progress Software Corp.
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,a2i.general