Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems
Article #162Re: Q: Are Packard Bell or Acer PC's reliable, and...
From: Ken Hancock
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 00:00
21 lines
1537 bytes
1537 bytes
>Avoid Packard Bell like the plague unless you never plan on upgrading >anything, and like a system that shorts you on what most companies >consider standard equipment (e.g. L2 cache....local bus slots..etc.) >Kurt >knowlwk@mail.auburn.edu >An Unsatisfied Packard Bell owner..... :( I agree. My main beef is the lousy service. While under the in house service portion of my warranty, my graphics adapter failed. It took 3 weeks for them to finally send someone to replace the motherboard. I wasted hours, literally, by waiting on hold on their useless customer support line. The waiting periods were long ( 45 min being common ) and the people were usually not very helpful. Ken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4inqfa$a1j@spot.Xpressnet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4ikjqq$iv4@ecom1.ecn.bgu.edu> <4il0uh$kvj@ns.campus.mci.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 105111,914713666f836c09 X-Google-Attributes: gid105111,public X-Google-Thread: 100cc1,914713666f836c09 X-Google-Attributes: gid100cc1,public X-Google-Thread: f53ba,914713666f836c09 X-Google-Attributes: gidf53ba,public X-Google-Thread: 11196f,914713666f836c09 X-Google-Attributes: gid11196f,public From: khancock@Xpressnet.com (Ken Hancock) Subject: Re: Q: Are Packard Bell or Acer PC's reliable, and... Date: 1996/03/20 Message-ID: <4inqfa$a1j@spot.Xpressnet.com> X-Deja-AN: 143142158 references: <4ikjqq$iv4@ecom1.ecn.bgu.edu> <4il0uh$kvj@ns.campus.mci.net> organization: InternetXpress, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA reply-to: khancock@Xpressnet.com newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,chi.wanted