🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 11 Oct 1995, Jacob Zielinski wrote:

> 
> 60 -> 60 * 1
> 66 -> 66*1
> 75 -> 50*1.5
> 90 -> 60*1.5
> 100 -> 66*1.5
> 120 -> 60*2
> 133 -> 66*2
> 150 -> 60*2.5
> 166 -> 66*2.5

Thats strange, my Supermicro p55cm doesnt want to have a clock multiplyer 
of 2.5, it only allows 1.5, 2, 3 and a mystery setting which I think is 
for the Pentium-this-name-is-so-crap-why-didnt-you-call-it-the-p6-pro.
If my supermicro has a setting for 66*2.5, I think ill use that, can 
anyone spread some light on this?

> 180 -> 60*3
> 200 -> 66*3 (if it ever gets made)
> 
> Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
> 
> >...
> >went slower than it should?  Why are intel charging so much for the p150,
> >if games are really going to run slower?  Are games players best waiting
> They're not charging anything for it since it isn't out yet. But rumor
> is that the P150 will debut in the $700 range, a nice bit below the
> usual 900-950. I guess it is so that they can sell the
> Pentium-what-marketing-genius-thought-this-name-up-Pro below 1000.
> 

	-Will
            -   -   -   -   -  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -

Posted by W.Harris

normal email : linc0081@sable.ox.ac.uk
work email : willh@strategicthought.co.uk
web  : http://sable.ox.ac.uk/~linc0081/