🚀 go-pugleaf

jmfelts@unity.ncsu.edu (John Michael Felts) wrote:
>..ms-windows.nt.setup.hardware:
>Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.cd-rom,alt.comp.hardware,biz.comp.hardware,comp.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.o
>
>s.ms-windows.nt.setup.hardware:
>References: <seanpry-1809951820080001@seanpry.clark.net> <43ot9d$4d1@s1.GANet.NET> <43qf8v$hmq@Vir.com>
>Organization: North Carolina State University
>Distribution:
>
>JH (joeh@vir.com) wrote:
>: Jim Cutlip <jc3@GANet.NET> wrote:
>
>
>: >Everybody rags on them pretty bad, but Packard Bell has a lot of systems
>: >that would fit your requirements. About the only thing that I would be
>: >concerned and careful about is to check the amount of cache that comes
>: >with the system. Also, pay attention to the video card. Other than that,
>: >I would recommend a PB to about anybody.
>
>
>: 	Spoken like a true PB public relations man.   And if you aren't
>: working for them already, I hope your resume is in the mail.  God
>: knows no one else would recommend that junk.
>
>
>: 					Joe Hachem
>
>
>Packard Bell's are actually pretty good computers.  The one thing that
>you need to watch out for when buying a Packard Bell (or any computer in
>general) is to make sure that the price of the computer includes the
>monitor, or at least factor that into the price of the computer.  I know
>that Packard Bell did not include monitor's in their prices a few years
>ago, but sold them as an add-on.  Many companies do this now.  Also, the
>Packard Bell technical support staff tends to be VERY bad.  Packard Bells
>are good computers, as long as you don't need any help with them...
>that's my two cents anyway.
>
>Mike Felts
>jmfelts@eos.ncsu.edu

Some of the local superstores have been selling Packard Bells in a package with monitors with a
39 dot pitch screen.  Tough on the eyes.  You'll probably junk this one soon.