Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #440Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither?
From: Andrew Pann
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 00:00
22 lines
2432 bytes
2432 bytes
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999 11:10:01 -0400, "Thomas Schamer" <t.schamer@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Yeah, that's because of the pass-through cable, but that's not what banding >is. Banding is where colors, instead of gradually smoothing, are in solid >chunks of one color and are put next to solid chunks of another color. It's >basically where there isn't a smooth transition between colors on some >textures, notably skies, for some reason. > > Mmm, in that case, I have to admit that I don't see any difference (except brightness) between the TNT2 and V3 screenshots in that review. :( Is it really that obvious (as the review states) to anyone else? The only screen shot that demonstrated an obvious difference in image quailty was that 3D Benchmark (text) shot at the very end. The V3 ss looked pretty awful there. Andrew
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<370ab6ad.11890202@netnews.worldnet.att.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <52F6ECA1A90D5450.1A1EA646BC48AB1D.E55D8869CC4050E0@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7de5eh$618$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <9E52D478FF2E9A84.BD5BBDA8BB69250D.99A93CFEA9E23551@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7df5c7$p5p$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <w8eL2.43$04.77@stones> <36fe5750.378438@news.thezone.net> <IDcN2.26600$Ll.3441@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <37056ea4.11213424@news.thezone.net> <M1lN2.27290$Ll.3184@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <370640a5.2827475@news.thezone.net> <sQtN2.3961$LM.7950@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e5rh4$1nq$1@news.erinet.com> <BdvN2.3986$LM.7965@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e6ghj$8d5$1@usenet44.supernews.com> <3706c846.0@news.mocc.net> <370910B8.290FA872@crenlo.nospam.com> <370939fb.1053298@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <7ed88e$pt9$1@mtinsc01.worldnet.att.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,3bf2e229bc16fa8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,3bf2e229bc16fa8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public From: ajp3@worldnet.att.net (Andrew Pann) Subject: Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither? Date: 1999/04/07 Message-ID: <370ab6ad.11890202@netnews.worldnet.att.net> X-Deja-AN: 463466955 References: <36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <52F6ECA1A90D5450.1A1EA646BC48AB1D.E55D8869CC4050E0@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7de5eh$618$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <9E52D478FF2E9A84.BD5BBDA8BB69250D.99A93CFEA9E23551@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7df5c7$p5p$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <w8eL2.43$04.77@stones> <36fe5750.378438@news.thezone.net> <IDcN2.26600$Ll.3441@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <37056ea4.11213424@news.thezone.net> <M1lN2.27290$Ll.3184@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <370640a5.2827475@news.thezone.net> <sQtN2.3961$LM.7950@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e5rh4$1nq$1@news.erinet.com> <BdvN2.3986$LM.7965@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e6ghj$8d5$1@usenet44.supernews.com> <3706c846.0@news.mocc.net> <370910B8.290FA872@crenlo.nospam.com> <370939fb.1053298@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <7ed88e$pt9$1@mtinsc01.worldnet.att.net> X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: mtinsc02.worldnet.att.net 923449157 18120 12.75.129.237 (7 Apr 1999 01:39:17 GMT) Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Apr 1999 01:39:17 GMT Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2