🚀 go-pugleaf

I'm offended that you are happy with me....

how about shhhhhhhhh fucker shhhhhhhhhh fucker shhhhhhhhhhhh fucker

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

--

Mike

Please remove the .NOSPAM from my email address when replying

check out - www.msu.edu/~tansymic

Paul Wilcox <wilcoxpb@jccomp.com> wrote in message
news:7e9bjc$5tr@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Would you rather have him saying the "F" word every third word? I would
> prefer the Shhhh anytime and I thinks he showing GREAT restraint compaired
> to before. Keep it up Mike!
>
>
> --
> Visit My web page at  http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/9006/
>
>
>
> Thomas Schamer <t.schamer@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:7e93mq$m36$15@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net...
> > Stop saying that shhhhh thing, please.
> > Mike <tansymic@pilot.msu.edu.NOSPAM> wrote in message
> > news:LaMN2.4156$LM.7273@news.rdc1.mi.home.com...
> > > shhhh
> > >
> > > You keep using 3 year old technology buddy, I'm movin' on up! heheheh
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > Please remove the .NOSPAM from my email address when replying
> > >
> > > check out - www.msu.edu/~tansymic
> > >
> > > John Reynolds <mjolnir@erinet.com> wrote in message
> > > news:7e7uo1$it0$1@news.erinet.com...
> > > > I think that's a bit overstated, but whatever gets you through the
> day.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > Mike wrote in message ...
> > > > >Just because you think your Ford Escort looks good, doesn't mean
that
> > the
> > > > >neighboors Ferrari isn't better.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >--
> > > > >
> > > > >Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >Please remove the .NOSPAM from my email address when replying
> > > > >
> > > > >check out - www.msu.edu/~tansymic
> > > > >
> > > > >John Reynolds <mjolnir@erinet.com> wrote in message
> > > > >news:7e6vrd$o5k$1@news.erinet.com...
> > > > >> I wouldn't say bad image quality.  It was quite good, for its
time.
> > > Now
> > > > >> it's mediocre. ..not bad, just middle of the road.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> john
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Mike wrote in message ...
> > > > >> >tnt=slow, good picture quality
> > > > >> >sli = fast, bad picture quality
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >you have nothin
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >shhhhhhhhhhhhh
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >--
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >Mike
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >Please remove the .NOSPAM from my email address when replying
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >check out - www.msu.edu/~tansymic
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >Machiavellian <rruss@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> > > > >> >news:rDBN2.29199$Ll.3649@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net...
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Mike <tansymic@pilot.msu.edu.NOSPAM> wrote in message
> > > > >> >> news:M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com...
> > > > >> >> >Get the fuck outta here! You would take a G400 or Perm3 over
> > > > >> >> >TNT2!!!!!!???????
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> OK, Mike let me explain something to you.  What is the TNT 2
> > > offering
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> >I
> > > > >> >> do not already have in my setup.  The TNT 2 offers nothing but
> > speed
> > > > >> which
> > > > >> >> my SLI setup does quite fine.  I already have a TNT and since
> the
> > > TNT
> > > > 2
> > > > >> >> looks exactly the same, its worthless to me.  The G400 and the
> > > > Permedia
> > > > >3
> > > > >> >> offer improved image quality than the TNT 2.  If the Permedia
3
> > and
> > > > >G400
> > > > >> >can
> > > > >> >> obtain the speed of a 125/150 clocked TNT 2, those cards look
to
> > be
> > > > >more
> > > > >> a
> > > > >> >> 3rd gen card than the TNT 2.  The TNT 2 is just a overclocked
> TNT
> > > just
> > > > >> >like
> > > > >> >> the V3 and its not worthy of a upgrade.  Neither the V3 nor
the
> > TNT
> > > 2
> > > > >> >offer
> > > > >> >> anything new to my setup and for the time they will be on top
is
> > > quite
> > > > >> >> small.  There are a lot of games I want to play that will have
> > > > >> >environmental
> > > > >> >> bumpmapping coming out real soon and since the TNT 2 does not
> > > support
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >> feature well you know.....
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>