Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #493Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither? id software has the answer mother fuckers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: Thomas Schamer
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00
73 lines
4410 bytes
4410 bytes
Oh, yeah, about the speed thing in the new benchmarks, I guess it's everyone's own opinion how much is a lot faster. And about Unreal, that's the game I need a new card for in the first place. My framerates are pretty low on it. Freon <See@signature.com> wrote in message news:37083184.0@news.mocc.net... > Dude, you really need to go back to that site and see what the hell you are > talking about. > First off, you have posted several times that the V3 results are (yes this > is a quote) "SO MUCH FASTER." There are no results for either card that are > much faster at all. Unreal is faster on the V3, but who the hell cares? > It's a Glide game with a last minute Direct3D hack and it's old shit anyway. > Now you say to go look at the screenshots. The Voodoo3 screenshots look no > better than my current Voodoo2. Maybe you really didnt look at the shots? > V3 Fog banding: http://www.riva3d.com/tnt2/unv3-2.jpg > That is exactly how it looks on my Voodoo2. Where is the improved image > quality? > > -- > Freon > m | b at mocc com > > Thomas Schamer <t.schamer@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:7e93ma$m36$5@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net... > > Look at the Unreal sky on the picture comparison of the V3 vs. the TNT-2 > on > > Riva3D. That may make you think otherwise. > > Freon <See@signature.com> wrote in message > news:3706c846.0@news.mocc.net... > > > Kroagnon <nope@spam.com> wrote in message > > > news:7e6ghj$8d5$1@usenet44.supernews.com... > > > > > > > > Mike <tansymic@pilot.msu.edu.NOSPAM> wrote in message > > > > news:BdvN2.3986$LM.7965@news.rdc1.mi.home.com... > > > > > Q3A is in 24bit or 32 bit color... and id software said that it will > > > look > > > > > like dog shit on V3 (in 16 bit color). That is one of the prime > > reasons, > > > > for > > > > > me buying TNT2 instead of V3. Also, I'm ready for better image > > quality. > > > > > > > > However the image quality issue is *not* a driver or speed issue as > you > > > > stated. They are two seperate issues. > > > > > > Voodoo2 image quality in 16bit is poor as well. Voodoo3 screenshots > look > > > exactly like my Voodoo2. The sky and clouds in Unreal is a perfect > > example. > > > Notice how it looks like crap on Voodoo2? Well, it doesnt look like > that > > at > > > all on a TNT or other video card, IN 16BIT. Why is that? People seem > to > > > blame the image quality on the 16bit limitation but that is not true at > > all. > > > Other cards in 16bit do not give the same banded, dithered, 8bit > looking, > > > fog, smoke, and blending. It has nothing to do with 16 vs 32 bit. > > > > > > > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7e9j84$6nb$3@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <52F6ECA1A90D5450.1A1EA646BC48AB1D.E55D8869CC4050E0@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7de5eh$618$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <9E52D478FF2E9A84.BD5BBDA8BB69250D.99A93CFEA9E23551@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7df5c7$p5p$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <w8eL2.43$04.77@stones> <36fe5750.378438@news.thezone.net> <IDcN2.26600$Ll.3441@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <37056ea4.11213424@news.thezone.net> <M1lN2.27290$Ll.3184@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <370640a5.2827475@news.thezone.net> <sQtN2.3961$LM.7950@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e5rh4$1nq$1@news.erinet.com> <BdvN2.3986$LM.7965@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e6ghj$8d5$1@usenet44.supernews.com> <3706c846.0@news.mocc.net> <7e93ma$m36$5@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <37083184.0@news.mocc.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,3bf2e229bc16fa8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,3bf2e229bc16fa8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public From: "Thomas Schamer" <t.schamer@worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither? id software has the answer mother fuckers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Date: 1999/04/05 Message-ID: <7e9j84$6nb$3@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net> X-Deja-AN: 462778978 References: <36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <52F6ECA1A90D5450.1A1EA646BC48AB1D.E55D8869CC4050E0@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7de5eh$618$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <9E52D478FF2E9A84.BD5BBDA8BB69250D.99A93CFEA9E23551@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7df5c7$p5p$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <w8eL2.43$04.77@stones> <36fe5750.378438@news.thezone.net> <IDcN2.26600$Ll.3441@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <37056ea4.11213424@news.thezone.net> <M1lN2.27290$Ll.3184@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <370640a5.2827475@news.thezone.net> <sQtN2.3961$LM.7950@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e5rh4$1nq$1@news.erinet.com> <BdvN2.3986$LM.7965@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e6ghj$8d5$1@usenet44.supernews.com> <3706c846.0@news.mocc.net> <7e93ma$m36$5@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <37083184.0@news.mocc.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net 923291716 6891 12.76.93.229 (5 Apr 1999 05:55:16 GMT) Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Apr 1999 05:55:16 GMT Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2