🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #503

Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither? id software has the answer mother fuckers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#503
From: Thomas Schamer
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00
87 lines
5169 bytes
No, it wasn't my friend.  I'm not saying that the image quality on the
Voodoo 2 is the best in the world, I'm just saying I can live with its
visual problems.  However, I still think that Voodoo 2 16 bit looks better
than TNT 16 bit- probably because I like to play my games on the highest
brightness setting- I can't stand a dark image.  I finally did notice
banding in the skies, but the only place this happens is on the flyby and in
the Nali Castle level.  And if anyone is offended by my opinions, don't take
them personally.  I'm not trying to flame anybody.
Freon <See@signature.com> wrote in message news:37082915.0@news.mocc.net...
> Yeah.. what ever..
> My friends and I have been Voodoo2 owners since it was released.  We
bought
> Unreal when it was released and played it on the V2.
> When Unreal 2.19 was released, I loaded up Direct3D Unreal for the first
> time at a LAN party.  Everyone there immediately noticed the lack of
> dithering and banding (in 16bit color).  People also noticed how vibrant
the
> colors were.  We also found that besides some funky lagged movement thing
it
> had going (fixed by a couple tweaks) it was performing the same in 800x600
> as my Voodoo2 (38fps).
> If your friend had to ask a Voodoo owner how he got it to look so good, he
> was doing something wrong.
>
> --
> Freon
> m | b at mocc com
>
> Ian Selkirk <selly@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:7e7fsn$dh2$1@mendelevium.btinternet.com...
> > Unreal crap on a V2? My TNT owning mate took one look at mine and nearly
> > shit himself........."How do you get it to look so good?" he exclaimed!
> > Thinking he has some config problem I took a look at another mates TNT
and
> > it was a disgrace!
> > Since then I have bought him a CL Voodoo2 so he can see what I am
talking
> > about when I say how visually stunning Unreal is.
> > Now he is getting an SLI set-up and unloading the TNT in favour of an
ATI
> > rage fury for 2D purposes only. ATI instead of Nvidia?.............Now
> that
> > is an insult!!
> >
> > Selly
> >
> > Freon <See@signature.com> wrote in message
> news:3706c846.0@news.mocc.net...
> > > Kroagnon <nope@spam.com> wrote in message
> > > news:7e6ghj$8d5$1@usenet44.supernews.com...
> > > >
> > > > Mike <tansymic@pilot.msu.edu.NOSPAM> wrote in message
> > > > news:BdvN2.3986$LM.7965@news.rdc1.mi.home.com...
> > > > > Q3A is in 24bit or 32 bit color... and id software said that it
will
> > > look
> > > > > like dog shit on V3 (in 16 bit color). That is one of the prime
> > reasons,
> > > > for
> > > > > me buying TNT2 instead of V3. Also, I'm ready for better image
> > quality.
> > > >
> > > > However the image quality issue is *not* a driver or speed issue as
> you
> > > > stated. They are two seperate issues.
> > >
> > > Voodoo2 image quality in 16bit is poor as well.  Voodoo3 screenshots
> look
> > > exactly like my Voodoo2.  The sky and clouds in Unreal is a perfect
> > example.
> > > Notice how it looks like crap on Voodoo2?  Well, it doesnt look like
> that
> > at
> > > all on a TNT or other video card, IN 16BIT.  Why is that?  People seem
> to
> > > blame the image quality on the 16bit limitation but that is not true
at
> > all.
> > > Other cards in 16bit do not give the same banded, dithered, 8bit
> looking,
> > > fog, smoke, and blending.  It has nothing to do with 16 vs 32 bit.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7e9j82$6nb$1@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <52F6ECA1A90D5450.1A1EA646BC48AB1D.E55D8869CC4050E0@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7de5eh$618$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <9E52D478FF2E9A84.BD5BBDA8BB69250D.99A93CFEA9E23551@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7df5c7$p5p$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <w8eL2.43$04.77@stones> <36fe5750.378438@news.thezone.net> <IDcN2.26600$Ll.3441@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <37056ea4.11213424@news.thezone.net> <M1lN2.27290$Ll.3184@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <370640a5.2827475@news.thezone.net> <sQtN2.3961$LM.7950@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e5rh4$1nq$1@news.erinet.com> <BdvN2.3986$LM.7965@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e6ghj$8d5$1@usenet44.supernews.com> <3706c846.0@news.mocc.net> <7e7fsn$dh2$1@mendelevium.btinternet.com> <37082915.0@news.mocc.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,3bf2e229bc16fa8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,3bf2e229bc16fa8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public
From: "Thomas Schamer" <t.schamer@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither? id software has the answer mother fuckers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 1999/04/05
Message-ID: <7e9j82$6nb$1@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>
X-Deja-AN: 462778976
References: <36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <52F6ECA1A90D5450.1A1EA646BC48AB1D.E55D8869CC4050E0@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7de5eh$618$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <9E52D478FF2E9A84.BD5BBDA8BB69250D.99A93CFEA9E23551@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7df5c7$p5p$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <w8eL2.43$04.77@stones> <36fe5750.378438@news.thezone.net> <IDcN2.26600$Ll.3441@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <37056ea4.11213424@news.thezone.net> <M1lN2.27290$Ll.3184@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <370640a5.2827475@news.thezone.net> <sQtN2.3961$LM.7950@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e5rh4$1nq$1@news.erinet.com> <BdvN2.3986$LM.7965@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <7e6ghj$8d5$1@usenet44.supernews.com> <3706c846.0@news.mocc.net> <7e7fsn$dh2$1@mendelevium.btinternet.com> <37082915.0@news.mocc.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net 923291714 6891 12.76.93.229 (5 Apr 1999 05:55:14 GMT)
Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Apr 1999 05:55:14 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2