Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video

Article #638

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video Previous Next

#638

From: Rick Baker
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:00

14 lines
1564 bytes

No it isn't. It's because they are gonna suck, period.


Chaotic Origin wrote:
> 
> Wait and see...everyone is pretty much arguing over cards that are not
> available. We may not see the final clock of the Diamond Ultra TNT-2 at
> 175mhz. We may see driver optimizations and better SSE or 3dNow! support.
> Why is it only the TNT2 or the V3? There are 3 or 4 cards coming soon which
> will have more 3d functions than either the TNT-2 or V3. I feel it is
> because of Tom Pabst's hype on the TNT-2 vs V3 which shows the result of bad
> journalism. We should also be talking about the PowerVR 250 Neon, the G400,
> Savage 4 or Permedia 3. There are 4 other cards and why are we only talking
> about 2 of 6 future cards? Tom Pabst is the reason.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <36FA9D86.652CF3A8@ti.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,3bf2e229bc16fa8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,3bf2e229bc16fa8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
From: Rick Baker <rb2b@ti.com>
Subject: Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither?
Date: 1999/03/25
Message-ID: <36FA9D86.652CF3A8@ti.com>
X-Deja-AN: 459080090
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.ti.com
X-Trace: tilde.csc.ti.com 922393988 24323 157.170.9.44 (25 Mar 1999 20:33:08 GMT)
Organization: Texas Instruments
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Mar 1999 20:33:08 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2

Reply to Parent Message