🚀 go-pugleaf

Thats Tom's fault? I thought it was because most of the other cards you
mentioned were gonna get their ass kicked by the TNT2/Voodoo 3. Nivida and
3dFX are the only two companies who have religious followings (since all the
other ones have been useless up until now) so they are the ones that get the
most hype. Lets see, Power VR: First card blew absolute chunks and next one
is extremely late, Matrox g400: So far they have yet to make a video card
thats not underpowered, S3 Savage 4: hahah S3, they have a bad rep to
overcome with that crap they used to sell, 3Dlabs Permedia3: Great 3D app
performance, bad game performance.

--
Mr. Mojo

"And a thousand thousand slimy things Lived on;
and so did I."
Chaotic Origin <7bu1q896t1@news.com> wrote in message
<7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
>Wait and see...everyone is pretty much arguing over cards that are not
>available. We may not see the final clock of the Diamond Ultra TNT-2 at
>175mhz. We may see driver optimizations and better SSE or 3dNow! support.
>Why is it only the TNT2 or the V3? There are 3 or 4 cards coming soon which
>will have more 3d functions than either the TNT-2 or V3. I feel it is
>because of Tom Pabst's hype on the TNT-2 vs V3 which shows the result of
bad
>journalism. We should also be talking about the PowerVR 250 Neon, the G400,
>Savage 4 or Permedia 3. There are 4 other cards and why are we only talking
>about 2 of 6 future cards? Tom Pabst is the reason.
>
>
>