Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #735Re: Boycott Canopus Spectra 2500: Bad 2D Text
From: Jerry
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 00:00
73 lines
3519 bytes
3519 bytes
Get the newest Canopus version or keep the STB 4400. Betelgeuse wrote in message <366040fd.0@news.cgocable.net>... >I went through 4 Spectras since I bought mine originally in early October. >The first board I got had abysmal 2D quality, so I exchanged it for another >through Canopus. The 2nd one had good quality but it had ghosting, which I >thought was due to my monitor, so I bought a new 19" monitor and used BNC >cables, still ghosting, and on top of that the board died shortly >thereafter. So I got another one, this one was a pre-release board and had >signs of physical damage, so I exchanged it again (also had ghosting), the >4th one which I'm using now has nice and sharp 2D but still has ghosting. I >talked to Canopus and they said the problem with poor image quality has been >solved and that there should be no ghosting. I'm sceptical however. I had an >STB Velocity 4400 and Millennium G200, both of which had no ghosting and had >superior 2D image quality. I'm not sure what I should do at this point. To >say I'm disappointed is an understatement. I expected nothing but the best >from Canopus, but got quite the opposite as it seems. > > >Betelgeuse, >"Armpit of the Giant" > >-------------------------------------------- >"I Am Become Death, The Destroyer Of Worlds! >-------------------------------------------- > > >Reply-to: > >betelg [ at ] cgocable [ dot ] net > >-------------------------------------------- > > >Inquisitor wrote in message ><3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.n e >t>... >>I've tried Diamond TNT and found that it's display quality is >>good, albeit not as good as G200 but the difference is >>negligible. So I surmised that all TNT boards have good >>display quality. >> >>I decided to go for the Canopus one as it has the >>reverse pass thru for V2 which I feel like should give >>me even better display quality. But I'm dead wrong. >> >>The display quality of Canopus TNT is bad, so bad that >>my eyes will go tire after few moments of staring >>at the screen. The perimeter of the text is jagged, >>the black is fading not solid and the background white >>is grey. I thought I have a bad card and exchage a new >>one but the same problem persisted. >> >>Then I check dejanews and found a plethorn of people >>complaining about the same thing. How I wish I have >>checked dejanews before I bought the card. >> >>I think the problem is Canopus is not using a reference >>board design but it's own proprietary design and they >>screwed up badly in the display department. >> >>I bought it because I want to be freed of the V2 pass thru >>interference but I'm getting exactly the opposite result. >>Regret is not a good enought word to describ my feeling at this >>moment. >> >> >> >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<73qvfe$af5@chronicle.concentric.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.net> <366040fd.0@news.cgocable.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,b06e508fcaae0ac1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,b06e508fcaae0ac1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public From: "Jerry" <jerryw@delta.net> Subject: Re: Boycott Canopus Spectra 2500: Bad 2D Text Date: 1998/11/29 Message-ID: <73qvfe$af5@chronicle.concentric.net> X-Deja-AN: 416710074 References: <3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.net> <366040fd.0@news.cgocable.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Organization: Concentric Internet Services Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2