🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #738

Re: Boycott Canopus Spectra 2500: Bad 2D Text

#738
From: Betelgeuse
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 00:00
65 lines
3461 bytes
I went through 4 Spectras since I bought mine originally in early October.
The first board I got had abysmal 2D quality, so I exchanged it for another
through Canopus. The 2nd one had good quality but it had ghosting, which I
thought was due to my monitor, so I bought a new 19" monitor and used BNC
cables, still ghosting, and on top of that the board died shortly
thereafter. So I got another one, this one was a pre-release board and had
signs of physical damage, so I exchanged it again (also had ghosting), the
4th one which I'm using now has nice and sharp 2D but still has ghosting. I
talked to Canopus and they said the problem with poor image quality has been
solved and that there should be no ghosting. I'm sceptical however. I had an
STB Velocity 4400 and Millennium G200, both of which had no ghosting and had
superior 2D image quality. I'm not sure what I should do at this point. To
say I'm disappointed is an understatement. I expected nothing but the best
from Canopus, but got quite the opposite as it seems.


Betelgeuse,
"Armpit of the Giant"

--------------------------------------------
"I Am Become Death, The Destroyer Of Worlds!
--------------------------------------------


Reply-to:

betelg [ at ] cgocable [ dot ] net

--------------------------------------------


Inquisitor wrote in message
<3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.ne
t>...
>I've tried Diamond TNT and found that it's display quality is
>good, albeit not as good as G200 but the difference is
>negligible.  So I surmised that all TNT boards have good
>display quality.
>
>I decided to go for the Canopus one as it has the
>reverse pass thru for V2 which I feel like should give
>me even better display quality.  But I'm dead wrong.
>
>The display quality of Canopus TNT is bad, so bad that
>my eyes will go tire after few moments of staring
>at the screen.  The perimeter of the text is jagged,
>the black is fading not solid and the background white
>is grey.  I thought I have a bad card and exchage a new
>one but the same problem persisted.
>
>Then I check dejanews and found a plethorn of people
>complaining about the same thing.  How I wish I have
>checked dejanews before I bought the card.
>
>I think the problem is Canopus is not using a reference
>board design but it's own proprietary design and they
>screwed up badly in the display department.
>
>I bought it because I want to be freed of the V2 pass thru
>interference but I'm getting exactly the opposite result.
>Regret is not a good enought word to describ my feeling at this
>moment.
>
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <366040fd.0@news.cgocable.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,b06e508fcaae0ac1
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,b06e508fcaae0ac1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public
From: "Betelgeuse" <spammers@spam.com.screw.you!>
Subject: Re: Boycott Canopus Spectra 2500: Bad 2D Text
Date: 1998/11/28
Message-ID: <366040fd.0@news.cgocable.net>
X-Deja-AN: 416549196
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-Trace: 28 Nov 1998 13:29:17 -0500, cgowave-92-245.cgocable.net
Organization: Spam Mallet Corp.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2