Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #738Re: Boycott Canopus Spectra 2500: Bad 2D Text
From: Betelgeuse
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 00:00
65 lines
3461 bytes
3461 bytes
I went through 4 Spectras since I bought mine originally in early October. The first board I got had abysmal 2D quality, so I exchanged it for another through Canopus. The 2nd one had good quality but it had ghosting, which I thought was due to my monitor, so I bought a new 19" monitor and used BNC cables, still ghosting, and on top of that the board died shortly thereafter. So I got another one, this one was a pre-release board and had signs of physical damage, so I exchanged it again (also had ghosting), the 4th one which I'm using now has nice and sharp 2D but still has ghosting. I talked to Canopus and they said the problem with poor image quality has been solved and that there should be no ghosting. I'm sceptical however. I had an STB Velocity 4400 and Millennium G200, both of which had no ghosting and had superior 2D image quality. I'm not sure what I should do at this point. To say I'm disappointed is an understatement. I expected nothing but the best from Canopus, but got quite the opposite as it seems. Betelgeuse, "Armpit of the Giant" -------------------------------------------- "I Am Become Death, The Destroyer Of Worlds! -------------------------------------------- Reply-to: betelg [ at ] cgocable [ dot ] net -------------------------------------------- Inquisitor wrote in message <3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.ne t>... >I've tried Diamond TNT and found that it's display quality is >good, albeit not as good as G200 but the difference is >negligible. So I surmised that all TNT boards have good >display quality. > >I decided to go for the Canopus one as it has the >reverse pass thru for V2 which I feel like should give >me even better display quality. But I'm dead wrong. > >The display quality of Canopus TNT is bad, so bad that >my eyes will go tire after few moments of staring >at the screen. The perimeter of the text is jagged, >the black is fading not solid and the background white >is grey. I thought I have a bad card and exchage a new >one but the same problem persisted. > >Then I check dejanews and found a plethorn of people >complaining about the same thing. How I wish I have >checked dejanews before I bought the card. > >I think the problem is Canopus is not using a reference >board design but it's own proprietary design and they >screwed up badly in the display department. > >I bought it because I want to be freed of the V2 pass thru >interference but I'm getting exactly the opposite result. >Regret is not a good enought word to describ my feeling at this >moment. > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<366040fd.0@news.cgocable.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,b06e508fcaae0ac1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,b06e508fcaae0ac1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public From: "Betelgeuse" <spammers@spam.com.screw.you!> Subject: Re: Boycott Canopus Spectra 2500: Bad 2D Text Date: 1998/11/28 Message-ID: <366040fd.0@news.cgocable.net> X-Deja-AN: 416549196 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3ED704704DBBC182.0B58B3FEE21AEC9A.C63A551C1DCBF22F@library-proxy.airnews.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 X-Trace: 28 Nov 1998 13:29:17 -0500, cgowave-92-245.cgocable.net Organization: Spam Mallet Corp. MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2