Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #768Re: 3DLabs & Real3D Sue Nvidia!!!
From: Anonymous
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00
15 lines
1197 bytes
1197 bytes
In article <360ad98c.3279188@207.126.101.100>, m8rox@usa.net wrote: > And Matrox, ATI, Rendition, NEC.. Whose left? > > Give me a break. 3dfx is now in the unenviable position of a company > who is too pussy to fight it out in the real market so they ask the > government to step in hold their hands. So let me get this straight: assuming that Nvidia did copy intellectual property that is patented by 3dfx to compete; 3fx should "duke it out" in the "real market"? Isn't nvidia the one that is actually being "pussy", by not developing thier own technology?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<nobody-2209981042200001@192.168.1.224>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<360ad98c.3279188@207.126.101.100>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,bbcbc42385672e55,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,bbcbc42385672e55,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) Subject: Re: 3DLabs & Real3D Sue Nvidia!!! Date: 1998/09/22 Message-ID: <nobody-2209981042200001@192.168.1.224> X-Deja-AN: 393712069 References: <360ad98c.3279188@207.126.101.100> X-Posted-Path-Was: NewsWatcher!user X-ELN-Date: Tue Sep 22 10:45:03 1998 Organization: Replay Associates, L.L.P Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2