Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #843Re: S3 Virge vs Virge DX vs ET6000
From: NBK
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 00:00
6 lines
991 bytes
991 bytes
My ET6000 has proven many times faster than a "Virge" (hate even breathing the name). The ET6000 is renowned for it's impressive 2D performance, but it still goes good with the 3D, but not as good as some (such as 3DFX chipsets etc). There is the ET6300 which has a 3D chipt set included, and that would be a worthy item of interest in many a tech's mind.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<34bb7448.0@139.134.5.33>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<34ba1376.0@lynx.ozramp.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109e38,a9c14a051b002560 X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,a9c14a051b002560 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,a9c14a051b002560 X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public From: "NBK" <NBK@bigpond.com> Subject: Re: S3 Virge vs Virge DX vs ET6000 Date: 1998/01/13 Message-ID: <34bb7448.0@139.134.5.33> X-Deja-AN: 315540862 References: <34ba1376.0@lynx.ozramp.net.au> X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,aus.computers,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc