Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #18818Re: Packard Bell Experiences?
From: Joe Trott
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 17:17
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 17:17
23 lines
1446 bytes
1446 bytes
Among the problems that I have encountered or heard about concerning Slackard Hell, 1) Their power supplies are too small. This translates to unreliability for a given load, and lack of expandability. 2) Their power supplies have a non-standard form factor. This means that when yours dies, you must replace it with another wimpy PB supply at 3x the price of a standard unit. 3) Other components are also non-standard. Integration of many components means a failure to one means an expensive replacement of a much larger part of the system. 4) Schematics, particularly for their monitors, are hard to get, adding days or weeks to the repair time. 5) Their cheaper monitors really suck, some with dot pitches of .42 or *worse*. There may have been others, but thankfully I haven't had to work with PBs for three years, nor heard much from the PC stores I'd frequent for leads (I was a consultant) for the last year. Other than that they were cheap and relatively turnkey (systems were typically complete, including rats and s/w preloaded). -JTT
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan4.171749.13807@dcatlas.dot.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dcatlas!joetReferences:
<C05vtH.Ir5@news.iastate.edu> <1993Jan2.133646.9349@spdcc.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dcatlas!joet From: joet@dcatlas.dot.gov (Joe Trott) Subject: Re: Packard Bell Experiences? Message-ID: <1993Jan4.171749.13807@dcatlas.dot.gov> Organization: U.S Dept. of Transportation References: <C05vtH.Ir5@news.iastate.edu> <1993Jan2.133646.9349@spdcc.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 17:17:49 GMT Lines: 25