Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #18893Re: What's the deal? My chip says "SX-25"; Norton says "SX-33"
From: Kyle Hor
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 15:16
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 15:16
41 lines
2756 bytes
2756 bytes
In article <C0CoGq.1ww@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib) writes: |> In article <1992Dec30.233238.14371@ptdcs2.intel.com> ssivakum@ptdcs2.intel.com (Sam Sivakumar) writes: |> |> > I work in lithography R&D, so I am not intimately familiar with the |> >sort and test world, but I know that every chip sold is tested. Usually, |> >once the lot of wafers leaves the fabrication line, every chip on each wafer |> >is tested for functionality as function of voltage and speed. There may be |> >other tests done at this stage as well, like transistor characteristics, etc. |> >and maybe others that I am not aware of. All chips that do not work are |> >inked, so when the wafer is diced into individual chips, the inked fellas are |> >rejected summarily. |> I agree 100%. This is how it is done. BTW, there are 3 main category of tests for digital ICs. functional : mainly boolean logics DC : voltage & current levels AC : switching speed At the wafer stage, only simple functional tests are performed as the DC and AC characteristics could change due to the processes further down the line. |> Hmmm |> |> Anyone know where one could write to get rejects like this? 'Twould |> be a nice conversation piece... |> |> Perhaps they wouldn't give away the latest 486-66/DX2 but surely there |> are old 286 wafers lying around somewhere.. |> I dunno what they do with the wafers, but they are unsightly. Good dice are taken out to be assembled as IC's and the remaining bad dice scattered across the wafer are all inked anyway. ............................................................................ . Kyle Hor . / / _ . Email khor@bnr.ca . . Bell-Northern Research Ltd. . /__\ / / /_\ . Phone (613) 763-2488 . . Ottawa, Ontario, Canada . / \ \/ / \__ . ESN 393-2488 . ....................................__/..................................... ................ standard disclaimer, 2 cents opinion .................... ............. searching forever, for the perfect solution ................
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan5.151627.9623@bmers95.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!bnrgate!bmers95!bnr.ca!khorReferences:
<C01LuI.542@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <sheldon.725671411@pv141b.vincent.iastate.edu> <1992Dec30.233238.14371@ptdcs2.intel.com> <C0CoGq.1ww@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!bnrgate!bmers95!bnr.ca!khor From: khor@bnr.ca (Kyle Hor) Subject: Re: What's the deal? My chip says "SX-25"; Norton says "SX-33" Message-ID: <1993Jan5.151627.9623@bmers95.bnr.ca> Sender: usenet@bmers95.bnr.ca Reply-To: khor@bnr.ca Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd. References: <C01LuI.542@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <sheldon.725671411@pv141b.vincent.iastate.edu> <1992Dec30.233238.14371@ptdcs2.intel.com> <C0CoGq.1ww@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:16:27 GMT Lines: 41