Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #18939Re: Gateway vs. Austin questions
From: Jon Pastor
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 22:40
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 22:40
34 lines
2555 bytes
2555 bytes
> Notice that it was the Ultra that got the Editor's Choice, not the > Ultra Pro. They felt that the Ultra Pro was not that much better > (and worse in some respects but I'd chalk that up to early versions > with bad drivers), and certainly the Pro is NOT worth the extra > cost. (the thing lists for $799!!!) Nobody is talking about buying it. It is packaged with the Gateway system, and thus effectively free. It's also blindingly fast. > they will NOT lower their price! The guy I used to deal > with would cave in with free shipping without me even trying! What planet did you grow up on? Gateway's prices are already better, for better-equipped systems, than the competition; they are selling so many that they can't keep up with the demand; and their systems have gotten top awards from all the major PC mags. What possible motive could they have for haggling on their prices? My salesman was courteous, helpful, and remarkably responsive, but I'm sure that he'd have lost about 2 nanoseconds of sleep if I'd told him I was going to order from someone else unless he gave me free shipping. "Sure, if you want to pay $200-1000 more for an equivalent system, be my guest," he might have thought as he called back the next person who was dying to get a Gateway system. I am delighted with my DX33V, and the 3 weeks was worth the wait. Their 66DX2 has been rated as the fastest PC on the planet, but if you want to go with second best for more money because Gateway won't make a good deal even better, hey, go ahead. I asked my salesman if they'd negotiate on a large (10+ system) order, and he said for that he could go to his manager and ask, but they have *no* incentive to negotiate on a single-system purchase from a private individual, and you're cutting off your nose to spite your face unless you can get a better price for as good a system elsewhere. I'm betting you can't, but more power to you if you can...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan5.224018.27795@gvl.unisys.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!udel!gvls1!prc.unisys.com!pastorReferences:
<1992Dec29.144306.18594@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <1992Dec29.161742.25146@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan4.191318.8598@gvl.unisys.com> <C0D9DF.9q5@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <C0E4Ep.7IC@panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!udel!gvls1!prc.unisys.com!pastor From: pastor@prc.unisys.com (Jon Pastor) Subject: Re: Gateway vs. Austin questions Message-ID: <1993Jan5.224018.27795@gvl.unisys.com> Sender: pastor@athansor (Jon Pastor) Nntp-Posting-Host: athansor Organization: not much... References: <1992Dec29.144306.18594@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <1992Dec29.161742.25146@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan4.191318.8598@gvl.unisys.com> <C0D9DF.9q5@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <C0E4Ep.7IC@panix.com> Distribution: usa Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 22:40:18 GMT Lines: 34