Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #18993Using slower-than-spec RAM
From: Tony Hamilton
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:59
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:59
23 lines
1696 bytes
1696 bytes
HI. Just bought a 486-33DX machine. For reference, it's an Intel _computer_... I work at Intel and bought one on an employee offer. Anyway, it came with 4MB installed, in a 32-pin SIMM or something like that (I'm new to memory). The system also comes with 2 banks of 4 9-pin SIMM sockets, for either 1x9 or 4x9 SIMMs (I still hope I'm getting these pin numbers right. It's the best I can remember - I don't have my manual with me). Well, anyway, the manual stated that you can mix and match SIMM types, as long as each bank of 4 has all the same, and is either all full or all empty. In addition, you can pop in an 8MB SIMM apparently in place of the 4MB one. Anyway... the manual suggests 80ns RAM, or faster. Because it was available and _very_ cheap, I popped in 100ns 1x9's in all 8 extra sockets, giving me 12MB total. Everything works fine, and I can verify the RAM is working for my applications which can use it. My question is: every tech person I talk to says not to do this, but they can't explain the reasoning behind that caution. I've heard it may have something to do with the bus and addressing, but I don't see any problems with the integrity of the memory. Should I be able to get away with this, or is there still a need for concern? Tony Hamilton thamilto@pcocd2.intel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C17oF6.L61@inews.Intel.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!fnugget!thamiltoShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!fnugget!thamilto From: thamilto@fnugget.intel.com (Tony Hamilton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Using slower-than-spec RAM Message-ID: <C17oF6.L61@inews.Intel.COM> Date: 21 Jan 93 15:59:29 GMT Sender: news@inews.Intel.COM (USENET News System) Organization: INTEL.FOLSOM Lines: 23 Nntp-Posting-Host: fnugget