Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #18997Re: What good are Bios RAM tests ?
From: Peter Herweijer
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:46
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:46
36 lines
1993 bytes
1993 bytes
In <1993Jan21.112136.2125@dmu.ac.uk> cph@dmu.ac.uk (Chris Hand) writes:
>In article <1jagkpINNarn@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes:
>
>No I don't thankyou. But I made a mistake in the original posting!
>
>It really was:
> SIMM Salesman: If your m/mboard can use 4Meg SIMMs it can use
> 3-chip SIMMs
> m/board guy: Your m/board can't use 3-chip SIMMs
> m/board docs: This m/board can use 4 Meg SIMMs (no mention of
> 3-chip or 9-chip).
>
>So there's an inconsistency here.
I see now.
>People have been talking about the BIOS making a difference to the refresh,
>but I would have thought it's the CHIPSET we should be looking at? After
>all that's what controls the refresh, caching etc.
Of course it is... but guess who controls the chipset? I suggest
you take a look at the 'chipset setup' section of your BIOS setup menu.
If this section contains an entry like:
Hidden Refresh Enabled
or Refresh Hidden
or something like that, you should have flipped that for 3-chip or 4Mb SIMMs.
Despite the fact that you've already solved the matter in the easiest
way, it would be nice if it were sorted out. I mean, how can you BEAR
to run Linux in 8Mb ? ;-}
Peter Herweijer
pieterh@sci.kun.nl
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C17L27.7Is@sci.kun.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!mcsun!sun4nl!sci.kun.nl!pieterhReferences:
<C0s2Dv.D2q@ichaos.nullnet.fi> <1993Jan15.111338.11134@dmu.ac.uk> <1jagkpINNarn@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1993Jan21.112136.2125@dmu.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!mcsun!sun4nl!sci.kun.nl!pieterh From: pieterh@sci.kun.nl (Peter Herweijer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: What good are Bios RAM tests ? Message-ID: <C17L27.7Is@sci.kun.nl> Date: 21 Jan 93 14:46:55 GMT References: <C0s2Dv.D2q@ichaos.nullnet.fi> <1993Jan15.111338.11134@dmu.ac.uk> <1jagkpINNarn@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1993Jan21.112136.2125@dmu.ac.uk> Sender: news@sci.kun.nl (News owner) Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands Lines: 36 Nntp-Posting-Host: wn2.sci.kun.nl