Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #1906280387-40 Math Coprocessor, which is best?
From: WORLEY LAWRENCE JA
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 03:29
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 03:29
9 lines
904 bytes
904 bytes
I am considering purchasing a math-coprocessor for my 386-40. I have heard that the Cyrix co-processor chip tests out the fastest and is the only one that can perform all of the instruction set with no compatibility problems. Does anyone have any experience/information on these chips? I am not concerned with the price differences, since they are minimal ($25-40), but am greatly concerned with getting the best available chip. Thanks- Jason Worley
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan6.032950.16722@a.cs.okstate.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!constellation!a.cs.okstate.edu!worleyReferences:
<1993Jan6.131035.1@brt.deakin.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!constellation!a.cs.okstate.edu!worley From: worley@a.cs.okstate.edu (WORLEY LAWRENCE JA) Subject: 80387-40 Math Coprocessor, which is best? References: <1993Jan6.131035.1@brt.deakin.edu.au> Message-ID: <1993Jan6.032950.16722@a.cs.okstate.edu> Organization: Oklahoma State University Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 03:29:50 GMT Lines: 10