Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #19128Re: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: William B Dwinnell
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:22
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:22
7 lines
900 bytes
900 bytes
No, I don't see anything wrong with using the 80x86 name- V20s and V30s are a little out of date, besides everybody knows they're Intel 80x86 clones. And, as someone else has already noted, people will keep on calling Intel's Pentium the "586", and when Pentium clones come out, the Pentium will be called the "Intels version of the 586". You may see Intel switch back before too long!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2297@blue.cis.pitt.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pitt.edu!wbdstReferences:
<1993Jan21.131523.10196@spider.co.uk> <1993Jan21.141858.24970@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pitt.edu!wbdst From: wbdst+@pitt.edu (William B Dwinnell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard,news.groups Subject: Re: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Message-ID: <2297@blue.cis.pitt.edu> Date: 21 Jan 93 22:22:03 GMT References: <1993Jan21.131523.10196@spider.co.uk> <1993Jan21.141858.24970@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Sender: news+@pitt.edu Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Organization: University of Pittsburgh Lines: 7