Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #19256Re: IDE vs. SCSI
From: Alex Jauch
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 20:05
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 20:05
26 lines
1710 bytes
1710 bytes
tn0s+@andrew.cmu.edu (Timothy L. Nali) writes: >Forgive me if this is an FAQ, but what is the difference between IDE and >SCSI hard drives/controllers. Which gives better performance under >ms-dos? under unix? Please forgive any technical blunders, I'm a systems guy, not a hardware guy. I've done a lot of testing of SCSI, ESDI, IDE, Etc. My conclusion is that right now, SCSI-II is pretty much the hottest thing going. This conclusion is not from any theoretical study of the standards, but from real-world observed performance. The reality is that the best hard drives are all SCSI hard drives right now. I'm thinking of 5400 RPM high transfer rate drives like the Quantum Barracuda series. When I can get a 3 1/2" 2 GB, 8ms drive, I don't ask too many questions about why it's so blindingly fast. On the controller side, SCSI wins again. My current mainstream favorite controller is the DPT SmartCache EISA SCSI controller. Put a Meg or two of Cache on that puppy and it even makes DOS fast. I haven't had any experience with local bus SCSI yet, but I'm assuming it will be even faster. So if speed is your concern, I'd say SCSI is your answer. -- Lamont Cranston "I once had a plan, but it seems to moses@netcom.com to have gone missing"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan7.200509.3989@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!mosesReferences:
<kfGvzvC00WB=4AzVIT@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!moses From: moses@netcom.com (Alex Jauch) Subject: Re: IDE vs. SCSI Message-ID: <1993Jan7.200509.3989@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) References: <kfGvzvC00WB=4AzVIT@andrew.cmu.edu> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 20:05:09 GMT Lines: 26