🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #19329

Re: SCSI Transfer Rates ??

#19329
From: Morgan Stair
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:11
41 lines
3079 bytes
>>Didn't he say it was a VL card?  That means that the CPU can't do
>>anything anyway, since when the disk controller has the local bus the
>>CPU can't talk to memory or anything anyway.  This is why I don't see
>>VL as a real win for anything except perhaps video; it will give you
>>great burst mode numbers, but it impacts overall system performance to
>>do that.  
>
>That doesn't make any sense. The only way to minimize the hit the CPU
>takes when doing DMA is to make the DMA go as fast as possible, which is
>what VLBus does. There's no free lunch. :)

  I'm on the verge of upgrading my 486DX-33 ISA machine to a 33MHz
VL-ISA motherboard that can handle a DX2 chip (To head off the
tangential questions now, there's a problem with my motherboard, and
the dealer's letting me swap up to what I think is a better
motherboard for a little more money).

  Is the VL bus an improvement or not?  I thought VL-ISA would be
superior to an EISA bus for my needs.  I mean, aside from video and
hard disks (2 VESA slots) what COMMON applications are there for DMA
transfers > 5MB/sec?  I suppose loading data into a soundcard's buffer
is one, but the industry is just starting to take advantage of the
16bit DMA channels (4-7) on the ISA bus (Gravis Ultrasound Card).

  I never put together that VL cards lock up the local bus to do their
transfers, whereas DMA transfers to/from an ISA card DON'T!!  Is this
true?  I know MS-DOS and MS-Winows (I think) aren't smart enough to
be impacted by this, but can anyone comment on whether any PC UNIX (Linux?),
Windows-NT, or OS/2 operating systems are intelligent enough to be
impacted, and how bad would it really be?

  Morgan
--
*************************************************************************
* W. Morgan Stair                        Phone: (617) 552-8783          *
* Boston College                         FAX:   (617) 552-8778          *
* Institute for Space Research           Email: morgan@dl5000.bc.edu    *
* 4 Alfred Circle                                                       *
* Bedford MA  01730                                                     *
*************************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID: <MORGAN.93Jan22101105@dl5000.bc.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!hsdndev!news.cs.umb.edu!morgan
References: <1993Jan17.134956.3123@solace.hsh.se> <1jdb71INN989@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1993Jan19.211953.26368@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <C16GHF.34r@unix.portal.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!hsdndev!news.cs.umb.edu!morgan
From: morgan@dl5000.bc.edu (Morgan Stair)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.os.linux,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32,comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: SCSI Transfer Rates ??
Message-ID: <MORGAN.93Jan22101105@dl5000.bc.edu>
Date: 22 Jan 93 15:11:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: dl5000.MORGAN.93Jan22101105
References: <1993Jan17.134956.3123@solace.hsh.se> <1jdb71INN989@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us>
 <1993Jan19.211953.26368@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <C16GHF.34r@unix.portal.com>
Sender: news@cs.umb.edu (USENET News System)
Distribution: all
Organization: Institute for Space Research, Boston College
Lines: 41
In-Reply-To: danb@shell.portal.com's message of 21 Jan 93 00: 10:26 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: dl5000.bc.edu